this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
528 points (91.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27814 readers
6049 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 110 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I kinda like electricity, and heat.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

IME you need to miss at least 2 payments before they shut off utilities, everyone not paying just 1 would be very very bad (for them lol).

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 53 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can't even convince people to just not change the clocks and tell daylight savings to fuck off. Come on public utilities!

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea, but man would it be so cool to see something like a mass non payment get traction LMAO

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Probably only do this in countries where your electricity companies are privately owned.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Come on public utilities!

I'm gonna need you to pay my bail

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

would be very very bad (for them lol).

Ok.. so the company that provides the infrastructure for you to get electricity and heat finds it no longer financially viable to operate and shuts down... What's the plan then?

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Off to the mines

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not in the winter. They can't do it during the cold months in many states. Everyone stop paying in the beginning of winter.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

They "can't" but they constantly do with no repercussions or backlash.

[–] Loss@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Then vote for public utilities instead of not voting at all at the local level.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 95 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Do you know what happens when societal structure collapses?

People with power and wealth accumulate more power and wealth.

People with the means and willingness to do violence acquire power and wealth from the vulnerable.

People without power, wealth and the means to do violence die.

[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Accelerationism is the ideology of idiots.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 29 points 1 week ago

People who never faced strife support accelerationism, let's see how you like it when you not only get beaten by the people above you but also beside you

[–] presbypenguin@reddthat.com 29 points 1 week ago

Accelerationism is the ideology of privileged idiots.

FTFY

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Truer words were never spoken

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Sometimes people here are just too eager for societal collapse.

I like having running water, hot and cold, safe and clean enough to drink it.

I like having a toilet that I just flush my crap away.

These will no longer be available during a societal collapse.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

When people are at the point where they are literally dying because they can't afford to live, you have to say there's not much else to lose.

The powerful just try and keep that balance of having enough people fall into poverty to keep everyone else in line, and avoiding having too many people in poverty so that we don't all eat them like we're supposed to.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

And then everyone who can't grow or rob their calories would be fucked.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Fades@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Cool and then you and your family and loved ones starve, don’t get the medical attention and maintenance they need, same with meds, emergency services, etc.

Don’t forgot you’re one of the fucking morons living inside and depending on the society you’re gleefully imagining collapse. So many innocents will be killed just from the fall of all of these services and whatnot.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What is "wage garnishment" for 200

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That requires a court order, could you imagine the shit show the court system would be for companies everywhere to get court ordered wage garnishment against even 50/60% of the population lol shit would grind to a halt

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Or they could just do it and force you to go through the courts to stop them

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 week ago

They would bring back debtor's prisons, and enjoy their new source of slave labor.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 16 points 1 week ago

I'm all for an organized, mass bill payment "strike" and some businesses would be effected, though not really any very large companies, who would benefit the most from having their competitors go out of business (and forced to sell or merge their assets for a fraction of their value) than we would by saving $100-200 per month, which we would spend, corporations would raise prices, and all of that money just flows back to the banks anyway.

Now tenant organizing and rent strikes, that's where you can actually fuck shit up and make demands many times. But like your gas company doesn't give I shit, you just won't have heat, fuck you.

It would be nice if this was true but it still based on the illusion of a free market

[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fun fact: Most red states derive a significant portion of their tax revenue from sales tax. In some places (like Texas) it accounts for 80% of the state's budget. If enough people significantly reduced their spending in red states, they could cripple the government and break no laws or contracts that would expose them to legal liabilities.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

What would crippling the government do other than massively harm regular people? Fight the real enemy, the billionaire class

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ScampiLover@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No they wouldn't
The second it became clear this was a larger theme they would sell the debt at a premium to the debt collectors
If it somehow got to the point of hurting a utility or big company government would ride in to the rescue

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminds me of those chain text messages about kids skipping school. "They can't give us all detentention!" I don't remember it ever working though.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Yes, they absolutely could give you all detention.

Besides, most kids actually understand the point of school.

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

Finally, I get the support I need to get started on that fasting diet I've been considering

[–] Depress_Mode@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's true and part of me would love to see that, but some utilities (such as water and electric) going under would probably be a bad thing if there wasn't a plan to swoop in and bring them under public control right away. Otherwise, things would get bad really quick in a lot of places if power and water stopped being available for everyone for an extended time. Things like hospitals, grocery stores, repair shops, etc. would all be working at greatly reduced capacity and capability. Barring a full-on revolution where the people could seize these utilities for public ownership and operate it themselves, I don't see that happening because the government would be likely to simply bail out a lot of the companies, or they'd be bought up and probably end up being consolidated by an even fewer number of people.

accelerationists love this trick

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

It would take years. This is a dumb take. Now not spending our money at big corporations and giving a little extra to the small places WILL help over time. And everyone can survive.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

They'd also stop providing whatever service they provide, which is why nobody will actually follow through on this.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Jesus Christ now any revolution is accelerationism, huh? And this is the response on Lemmy of all places. We really are doomed.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not taking a side on this. Instead asking a question and hoping for someone to explain

Those who do not support the idea of this kind of strike, do you support the idea of a general strike? A collection work-stoppage? If so, what is the fundamental difference? I have my opinions, but I really want to know yours.

Also, I fucking love mid-sentence exclamation points. It makes me happy every time I see it.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They'll both accomplish the same thing, except my meme does it without risk to the individual losing their job since in the US there is no protection from termination unless you're already in a union and not working due to an official union action

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, there are no consequence free actions in any kind of scenario such as this. Lose your job for a general strike. Lose your utilities for a bill paying strike. Lose your job and you can't pay your utilities. Lose your utilities and you can't shower and will lose your job. Either way you're fucked. The only solution is to make sure you have enough people willing to join to make it impossible, or as close to impossible as possible, to ignore your demands.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›