this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
1021 points (98.6% liked)

196

1839 readers
2228 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 130 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm like 99% sure that "Violence is never the answer" is just yet ever more rich fuck propaganda.

[–] paperemail@links.rocks 109 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

It’s also very Liberal propaganda.

Martin Luther King Jr. protested and he won so peaceful protest works!

While of course barely mentioning the Black Panthers and how MLK was suddenly a reasonable alternative to their violent resistance.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 week ago

And his "peace" was met with an extreme act of violence. Certainly was an answer for someone(s).

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly this. The "carrot and stick" strategy doesn't work without the stick. Every time a nonviolent movement achieves something, it's because they were seen as the preferable alternative to a more militant contemporary.

[–] paperemail@links.rocks 9 points 1 week ago

Exactly. The same goes for implementing social welfare in the face of the Soviet Union and local communist movements.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only reason MLK didn't do more was because what they were already doing was illegal, and anything more could get them jail time. And this is still what they thought of him and his "peaceful" protests:

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They did the same shit when they pretended that BLM burned down cities. We really don't learn even from our recent history, huh?

Same as it ever was.

[–] SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

dying at this, what a perfect demonstration

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago
[–] Hossenfeffer 6 points 1 week ago

I’m like 99% sure that “Violence is never the answer” is just yet ever more rich fuck propaganda.

"Violence (against the rich) is never the answer!" is what they really mean.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's a good motto to not get into a petty fight for petty shit because of emotion. It did not mean all violence because you also need violence as a defence against violence.

On the other hand, if the next 4 years we(as in us who isn't from the US) didn't see a civil war or violence protest, then people like oop that love to repeat this stuff should totally go outside and touch grass. These teasing is getting tiring.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

Adventure time explained it pretty well imo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xakGZvLjI

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought it was just something we taught children

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 86 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

A rich jackass with no actual government position took the podium at the presidential inauguration, did the nazi salute, and wasn't promptly shot or arrested. That says a lot about the state of this country.

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 22 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Yeah, he did a nazi salute, not admitted to being a communist. Being a nazi has never not been accepted and normal in America.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

There have been times where real Americans shot at Nazis instead of voting them into the White House.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Soap box

Ballot box

Ammo box <-- we are here not by choice, but we must answer

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

You missed jury box! Free Luigi!

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

After Ballot and Before Ammo is Street. It's an important stage because if you can't get enough people in the street then the ammo box isn't going to help you.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (9 children)

In the frame of the four boxes, it's actually the jury box. But seeing how the judiciary is getting stacked against us, it's not a big stretch to say we're at box four

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Where does the beat box fit in?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know, in the civil war, when they had the guys drumming to keep the march in time?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] amon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You mean boombox?

Violence is the answer when less universal languages stop being an option

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When two sides are fighting, and one uses violence and the other doesn't, side using violence almost always wins.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

It's not the answer, it's the question. The answer is "yes"

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think the Geneva conventions were also something rather new because biological warfare, civilian hostages including women and children, massacres, and destruction of vital resources like food and water were pretty standard for thousands of years of war and combat.

Of course as history has shown, no one actually bothers to follow the Geneva conventions when they face zero consequences but will totally complain if anyone else doesn't (cough Israel cough).

Biological weapons, for the time being, are mutually banned because disease is hard to control in a warzone where anything has the chance to mutate or evolve. Gas attacks are used exclusively against civilians because every army has gas masks. Although iirc Iraq used it to create a massive untraversable barrier against Iran. Otherwise everything is apparently still the same.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I think there needs to be a bit of differentiation.

There always have been particularly ruthless and brutal armys, who would pillage, rape and murder civillians, just as there have been disciplined armys and leaders who made a point of only fighting the enemies army.

However the extent to which people could go about slaughter with swords, pikes and muskets is very different than the extent of machine guns, artillery, and carpet bombing.

Also it is psychologically researched that the further someone is to another human, the less empathy they feel. It takes much more decisiveness to slay someone with a sword than to shoot at him from a hundred meters than to press a button in your drone control room while having your coffee and the breakfast you got on the way driving to work.

War always has been brutal, but modern technologies have enabled the scaled and speed of destruction to go far beyond what was historically imaginable. So the need to create some sort of rules to limit the effects also has increased tremendously.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

While I'm sure there's some that are worse than others I'm pretty sure every conflict has involved widespread rape.

Someone please correct me if you can. It would help me like humanity a little bit more.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] randombullet@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago

Geneva convention only applies to losers. Winners write history.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I would also add that weaponizing rape is not a typical (though not totally absent) characteristic of peasant revolution whereas it is an extremely widespread (but not totally ubiquitous) characteristic of conquest/colonialism and political control of minorities by state projects.

Edit: Meant to respond to @drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago

re reads 2nd amendment Huh. Now it makes sense.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy 8 points 1 week ago
[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

No dwarf is shitty fam, gotta love yourself. Rock and stone <3

load more comments
view more: next ›