There always have been particularly ruthless and brutal armys, who would pillage, rape and murder civillians, just as there have been disciplined armys and leaders who made a point of only fighting the enemies army.

However the extent to which people could go about slaughter with swords, pikes and muskets is very different than the extent of machine guns, artillery, and carpet bombing.

Also it is psychologically researched that the further someone is to another human, the less empathy they feel. It takes much more decisiveness to slay someone with a sword than to shoot at him from a hundred meters than to press a button in your drone control room while having your coffee and the breakfast you got on the way driving to work.

War always has been brutal, but modern technologies have enabled the scaled and speed of destruction to go far beyond what was historically imaginable. So the need to create some sort of rules to limit the effects also has increased tremendously.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

just as there have been disciplined armys and leaders who made a point of only fighting the enemies army.

Any examples?

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Salah ad-Din Yusuf ibn Ayyub who liberated Jerusalem from the Crusaders in 1187 was renowned for sparing Civillians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saladin

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 hours ago

Cool, thanks for digging this out of my memory... I learned about this dude in college and had completely forgot of his existence.

Sucks that we have to go back that far to find one though...

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 12 hours ago

While I'm sure there's some that are worse than others I'm pretty sure every conflict has involved widespread rape.

Someone please correct me if you can. It would help me like humanity a little bit more.