this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
53 points (89.6% liked)

News

23274 readers
3376 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As children across the U.S. head back to classes and practices for fall sports, four more states are expecting their K-12 schools to keep transgender girls off their girls teams.

Kansas, North Dakota and Wyoming had new laws in place restricting transgender athletes before classes resumed, and a Missouri law takes effect at the end of this month, bringing the number of states with restrictions to 23.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Are there professional high school teams I don't know about? Or are these laws specifically to keep kids from having fun playing sports with zero stakes?

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, it's not zero stakes with high school athletes looking to get scholarships and schools making money and funding from football. To say nothing of parental egos. If only it were as easy to sweep under the rug by claiming it isn't worth caring about.

This is just the tip of the iceberg, too. So much of life is nearly divided up into make and female without thinking about what constitutes an advantage. Maybe basketball needs to be divided into two leagues for over and under 6'6". Perhaps hockey should be split by bone density. Or whatever, but my point is gender is a big dividing line for our society and we are attacking that line. It's going to be messy.

I predict the eventual result is to no longer have gendered competitions at all. Which in some ways is good but would likely result in much lower participation by women in certain sports.

I support trans rights and IDGAF about sports, but I don't see any clean way out of this mess. Something fundamental is going to have to change to answer this issue.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe basketball needs to be divided into two leagues for over and under 6'6". Perhaps hockey should be split by bone density. Or whatever,

Maybe not split, but we should take this into account for scoring purposes. In powerlifting, your height (and thus weight) is the main determining factor in how much you can lift. We account for this by using weight classes, but that has the problem of either dividing up everyone so finely that many weight categories in local competitions only comprise of one athlete, or grouping too many people together that competition is no longer fair. There's also the Wilk score (getting replaced last I heard due to some drama. Not sure what they use now), which calculates an overall score based on your exact weight and allows comparisons across weight classes.

So for other sports, we could have something similar to this Wilk score. In basketball for example, it could determine how much each basket is worth for each team based on the composition of the team. It wouldn't be perfect, but it's probably a lot better than dividing across gender lines, and would open up competition to people who enjoy the game but aren't insanely tall.

[–] whynotzoidberg@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Are there really zero stakes? Does the work a child does in K-12 not impact their opportunities post K-12?

Sex has been a long-standing issue in organized sport. The IOC has their own challenges with it, even.

Club sports, as opposed to organized sports, are more of the “for fun / zero stakes” type of sport IMO.

I wish the issue was more black and white, but holy cow is it a tough one when you dig your heels in.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not zero stakes. Just put college scholarships aside for a second. Athletes put everything they have into their game. They make TONS of sacrifices to excel and win. Why don't you ask the girls how they feel about competing against a trans girl? You and I have no skin in the game, so our opinions don't matter much. Right? That's the core message of DEI, that it's our job to listen. So listen to the millions of girls who would be impacted by the decision.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the millions of girls who would be impacted by the decision.

I honestly don't think there are that many trans people. Most of these states likely don't even have a single trans highschool student in the entire state. Trans people are a minority of a minority. I feel like it should almost be a case by case basis.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I meant the non-trans girls who compete in sports. I think there are only about 1000 trans girls, but that number could be wrong. Both numbers are guesses. The point was that there are a lot of girls that could be impacted and they should have an active voice in the decision.

[–] zaph@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you think millions of girls in the US are impacted by trans people you've bought more propaganda you think. Much closer to dozens than millions but probably more accurately hundreds. I'm more inclined to protect the girls who would become suicidal because they're being told they don't belong in public but you do you.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I meant the non-trans girls who compete in sports. I think there are only about 1000 trans girls, but that number could be wrong. Both numbers are guesses. The point was that there are a lot of girls that could be impacted and they should have an active voice in the decision.

[–] zaph@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know what you meant and there aren't millions of cis girls impacted by trans girls. That number is a massive inflation to make the impact seem more worrisome. It's called fear mongering.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That wasn't my intent and I think you realize that but are still choosing to ignore the actual point, so you win.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The latter.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

The real question is whether they're stopping this dude from competing on the girls teams.

[–] kttnpunk@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As a trans person, sports are inherently unequal, unfair and some people do have biological advantages. If Micheal Phelps can use his freak lungs and webbed feet in the fucking OLYMPICS why can't a young trans girl compete at a goddamn h.s meet? People only seem to care when it's a trans person, but rules can impact cis people as well. Plenty of born cis women have excess testosterone and have even been banned from sporting events in the past, ntm the right's best answer to this perceived problem? introducing genital inspections. Let's get real, sports are just fucking games. They shouldn't be taken any more seriously.

[–] girlfreddy@mastodon.social -1 points 1 year ago

@kttnpunk @MicroWave

Exactly. This whole gd screaming match over what constitutes being a woman has zero basis in science.

If the transphobes would just sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up, that'd be good.