OldWoodFrame

That sounds right to me but is both a little hopeless (I guess we'll just flip flop the presidency term-to-term forever?) and disagreeing with the premise of "pro-corporatism" from the OP.

Sorry who is saying this? The judge making the ruling?

I have him in a PPR league and my opponent rage benched all his players haha.

Weird question, were there any elections in between those years? If so, why did they get left out?

Either Joe Biden wasn't "pro-corporate" or there was some other similarity to the 2016 and 2024 candidates that fits better....

There are no numbers that say being less moderate would have won the election for Harris.

"Voters who voted for the winner got what they wanted" uh-huh....

A couple guys tried that during the campaign IIRC.

Every interest group in the Democratic party after a loss: "See? It's because [Candidate] didn't agree with ME enough!"

Maybe if they did your idea the loss would have been worse.

Weird you didn't post this before the election results came in, since it was so obvious.

I have deep sources telling me he got more votes.

Assuming...you know...Biden will lose his record for oldest president ever and the gerontocracy continues.

Gotta think 2029 brings the biggest drop in age for a long time, JFK was 26 years younger than Eisenhower. We could beat it with a 56 year old in 2029. Vance would break that record if by election or...you know...but I think Whitmer would be 56 exactly. Wes Moore, Buttigieg, Josh Shapiro would all break it.