this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
595 points (95.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27419 readers
5048 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rin@lemm.ee 331 points 2 days ago (19 children)

The fact that people are ok with this blows my fucking mind. Corps literally normalised being buttfucked.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 77 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I'm pretty sure most people who are doing this are trying, in their own way, to make a point.

It wasn't about "national security". It was about a large digital meeting place where ideas could be shared, or feelings and frustrations at their government could be seen and felt by others who felt the same. Big Brother doesn't like that, unless it is on US Corporate Approved Social Media, where they can promptly shut you down, or get their algorithm to put post with specific keywords out of the eyes of as many as possible.

So, instead of creating actual data privacy laws, as they should have, they decided to attack TikTok, because Mark Zuckerburg got in front of congress during whatever case it was that brought his lizard ass in the room (maybe the Cambridge Analytica scandal?) and said that TikTok was more dangerous than his own platform.

There you go. It was never about "national security", as there were much better ways to handle that than banning one single app.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

They did write data privacy laws when they banned TikTok. Read HR 815 Division H and Division I of 118th Congress, which is just HR 7520 and 7521 bundled into a larger bill.

The original text of HR 7520 is:

(a) Prohibition.—It shall be unlawful for a data broker to sell, license, rent, trade, transfer, release, disclose, provide access to, or otherwise make available personally identifiable sensitive data of a United States individual to—

(1) any foreign adversary country; or

(2) any entity that is controlled by a foreign adversary.

(b) Enforcement by Federal Trade Commission.—

(1) UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE ACTS OR PRACTICES.—A violation of this section shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or a deceptive act or practice under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)).

(2) POWERS OF COMMISSION.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall enforce this section in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this section.

(B) PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES.—Any person who violates this section shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act.

(3) AUTHORITY PRESERVED.—Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the authority of the Commission under any other provision of law.

Definition of Foreign Adversary:

"(4) FOREIGN ADVERSARY COUNTRY.—The term “foreign adversary country” means a country specified in section 4872(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code."

Which states:

"(2) Covered nation .— The term “covered nation” means— (A) the Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea; (B) the People’s Republic of China; (C) the Russian Federation; and (D) the Islamic Republic of Iran."

But I think it also includes a few other countries, idk if this text is up to date.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 0 points 34 minutes ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago) (1 children)

I... don't really care about a foreign government having my data. Like, Id rather no one does, but the US government is the only one with direct impact on my life personally. Who gives a fuck about China. I will literally never go there.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

I don't care if you don't mind having harm done to you, the entirety of the USA would suffer from continued data collection by the CCP. The entirety of the USA would suffer from more "pig butchering" scams, more industry hacks and subterfuge, more US Military installations being mapped out. That's all ignoring their impact on politics.

So stop bothering us here and go screw around on RedNote if thats what you think.

[–] TeraByteMarx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doing the the thing in direct opposition to what an authority is demanding is like a trauma response or something.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it's also a good idea when the authority is being a piece of shit and grew too comfortable in their position.

[–] yamper@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

moving your data from your domestic authoritarian to a foreign authoritarian isn't the gotcha you think it is

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

The data is stored on US soil, so whatever they are able to gather, the US government is allowing it. Which means… all social media. So, ban all social media then if it’s such a risk, right? Or.. I don’t know.. maybe make an actual data privacy law so no one can steal and hoover up your precious data?

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It is if you want to stick it to the domestic authoritarian

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tabooki@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago (14 children)

China was caught logging every keystroke through this. It's why some revamped it's permissions a while ago.

In China it shows people how to be good, science, technology., education, nature.

Here it show kids to eat tide pods.

It's a propaganda method for China.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, surely no other apps log keystrokes. Certainly not Gboard!

[–] j_overgrens@feddit.nl 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's irrelevant whether other apps do it -- it's still wrong.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

See, to me, it’s not irrelevant. Either make a blanket data privacy law, or shut the fuck up.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Right? If logging keystrokes is "wrong", then ban that! I've never downloaded TikTok in my life but this entire thing is so transparently manufactured.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course not, Google does no evil. Everyone knows that.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago

Does anybody have that image of Google as Lionel hutz' advertisement from the Simpsons?

Don't be evil?
No, Selling Data!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] TeraByteMarx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yeah. Lemmy users should spend a bit of time deconstructing why tik tok makes them so angry. There's a bit to unpack there. Not that it isn't trash.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 157 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

People are disgusted by the idea that one random person could track their every move and read everything they write.
Unless that person is employed at a large corporation.

I used to date a Google employee. They had a Signal chat where they shared screenshots of funny or interesting shit they saw on the user accounts.
And many abused their access to spy on ex-partners and the like.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Its actually worse than that.

I've recently met an increasing number of Gen Alpha / Zoomers that all have all their friends in some kind of family location tracking app, so they all know each other's locations at all times, and actually you're a rude asshole if you think that's weird.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

They also think you're rude if you don't have an iPhone. What a weird generation.

[–] tourist@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

oh fuck

That's horrific. I hope your relationship ended amicably?

[–] superkret@feddit.org 81 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not really, she caught me Binging someone else.

[–] tourist@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

I forgot which community this was lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 74 points 1 day ago

I am still angry at Facebook for normalizing using your real name. That eroded a lot of basic security practices.

Now little 7yos share mommy's credit card in YouTube comments.

[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 45 points 2 days ago

I used to be disgusted that people didn't seem to care that they were risking their own privacy and national security to boot. But then I remembered that our own government won't do anything to keep our individual privacy in check from corporations. So as long as that's the case, I don't see why anyone should give a fuck. The government did this to themselves.

[–] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

We underestimated how little people trust the government compared to how much they hate china

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And hence EU and UK regulations are so fucking needed. GDPR and legal requirements for companies to follow is a god sent.

Got a cold email? &hit them with that sweet chat gbt copy pasta!

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Got a cold email? &hit them with that sweet chat gbt copy pasta!

Wait what? Can you give me more details?

Sorry I'm too American because I bend over and accept corporate penetration.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

So, company cannot buy your data. A company also needs a valid reason to hold your data. Also, company needs to have your consent to have this data, ie, you need to interact with them.

So if someone messages you out of the blue, someone you never dealt with... How did they get your info? How do they have a valid reason to contact you if you never dealt with them before? And why would they have your permission to contact you if you never gave it to them?

Answer is, they're using your info illegally. The copy pasta is basically giving them notice to remote all your records and if they don't comply you'll be reporting them.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fun fact - GDPR applies to EU citizens wherever they are, so as an American you can ask to get your data removed based on GDPR and even though it doesn't apply to you, they will often not bother to check and do it.

Or, you know, claim they deleted the data, which is the best you'll get nowadays.

load more comments (13 replies)