NikkiDimes

joined 1 year ago
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago* (last edited 38 minutes ago)

I think the biggest issue arises in the fact that most new creations and new ideas come from a place of necessity. Maybe someone doesn't quite know how to do something, so they develop a new take on it. AI removes such instances from the equation and gives you a cookie cutter solution based on code it's seen before, stifling creativity.

The other issue being garbage in garbage out. If people just assume that AI code works flawlessly and don't review it, AI will be reinforced on bad habits.

If AI could actually produce significantly novel code and actually "know" what it's code is doing, it would be a different story, but it mostly just rehashes things with maybe some small variations, not all of which work out of the box.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

What AI did you use? I feel like most should have (big "should have") known better since the vulnerability was within it's cutoff date. Yikes.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 6 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

If these last 10 years have taught me anything, it's that most Americans are not progressives.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago) (1 children)

Can I screenshot this comment and post it on Twitter as ragebait to farm engagement?

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

To be fair, this research comes from a limited number of patients and is from the 1950s and 60s, a time not exactly known for its accurate assumptions in the field of neuroscience, lol.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

It's an extremely common aspect of human psychology to make up a story to explain the results of an event or reasoning for your actions after the fact.

It's even been demonstrated in specific cases in studies of people who've received brain hemisphere bifurcation to prevent grand mal seizures.

The side of the brain responsible for speech is not shown information or things the individual must complete, then when asked why they performed such an action, the speech responsible side of the brain will spontaneously make up a resonable sounding story to explain it.

I highly recommend checking it out. It's an absolutely fascinating look into human psychology

I'm sure I do this same thing all the time subconsiously, and I've certainly noticed it in others.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And should things turn around and the overwhelming consensus somehow turns against Trump (seems highly unlikely currently), people will just lie about having supported him.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Which do you choose: genocide or WORSE genocide? You have to pick one. Not picking either gets you the latter by default. Make a choice.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

One of my big hopes was if they won, it'd open us up to a potential Walz presidency in the future. I was all aboard with Kamala herself, but Walz? That'd be sick.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I can tell you right now that isn't the case. Proof: be a woman and join any CoD lobby.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it's fitting. He himself would be physically fine whilst everything collapses around him when the floor drops out.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Eh, he might be a cis het white Christian who hates what's going on?

view more: next ›