this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
516 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39165 readers
2767 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

I love how after all the tankie YouTube videos boasting the "superiority" of Russian arms, the S-400 and S-500, Iskander etc... we finally get to see that the entire Russian military is just vaporware.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 58 points 1 year ago

More like vaporized ware lmao

[–] Jesus_666@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

I mean, on paper the S-400 and S-500 were very impressive and credibly so

They just didn't turn out to be that effective in reality.

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At least with the air defenses the weakness that was exploited would be common to all air defense systems. It's a failure of tactics/strategy instead of a technical issue with the system.

The Ukrainians started throwing tons of cheap drones at targets and forced a dilemma: 1) Engage the drones, exhaust the air defense systems' capabilities, and then the air defense systems get targeted by cruise missiles/air strike or 2) don't engage as many drones, which lets them reach their targets.

Israel's vaunted Iron Dome system was also overwhelmed with the sheer amount of relatively cheap rockets from Gaza during the Oct 7th attacks, but obviously Hamas lacks the sophistication to follow that up with attacking the systems themselves.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think that's entirely fair, the system wasn't operating at the time of the attack. It does seem to work, it just jams absolutely everything.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not what vaporware is...vaporware doesn't exist, it's vapor.

Russians lie about a lot, especially their military's capabilities and they have had plenty of vaporware e.g. T-95.

However...

The S-400 and Iskander are real, they just aren't as capable as described. The S-400 can't target stealth aircraft, although it can possibly track 1st gen stealth (track vs target are very different).

The Iskander is a capable ballistic missle with hypersonic speeds...just like ballistic missiles have since the 60s. But it still follows a ballistic trajectory, and is NOT capable of hypersonic maneuvering.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As much of a win as this is, there are any number of normal battlefield conditions and reasons this could've happened, that aren't just "HAHA RUSSIAN MILITARY DUMB"

  1. Electronic warfare systems are typically cycled to allow friendly forces to use the spectrums they jam. These schedules are timed by counter-EW teams.
  1. Missles and bombs often have multiple guidance systems e.g. the GMLRS fired by HIMARS/M270 MLRS both GPS and intertial guidance systems.
  1. HARM (Anti-radiation missiles) could have been deployed to force the Russians to kill active radar systems of the SAM battery protecting this system.
  1. Laser guidance from special forces, or local partisan group, could have provided the targeting.
  1. The story itself could be part of an information or counter-intelligence operation to hide real means and methods used, or trick Russian military/intelligence.

And these are just a few reasons why while this is a win, should probably not be used as confirmation bias to underestimate Russia's capabilities.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It doesn't change that "HAHA RUSSIAN MILITARY DUMB" either though.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's just not accurate, and honestly, it's dangerous.

Yes, the Russian military is deeply flawed and at times, comically tragic in its errors, but it's still a lethal organization that has shown itself capable of learning and adapting.

That attitude is most concerning because the unsaid, but logical next point is, "then why hasn't Ukraine won? Are they HAHA DUMB as well?"

You may not be thinking that, but that is what pumping that idea out into the ether leads to.

Yes, they have made mind boogling choices at times, but at other times, they've shown high levels competence and the ability to change and evolve their tactics, much to the detriment of Ukrainian forces.

Listen when adults speak to you

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I do wonder what the impact will be on Russia’s military equipment export business thanks to this war. It’s pretty clear now how inferior their tech is compared to the west.

[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I think they are currently also having a massive brain drain with their educated population simply leaving elsewhere to get better pay and not get drafted.

Good.

If you are a college educated Russian reading this, please consider motivating all in your influence to move to another country that is not the Russian Federation; USA will pay you better and treat you better with your knowledge and talents and is a country occupied entirely by immigrants from every culture, so you will not have trouble finding your community.

[–] zepheriths@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

That's been happening since the collapse of the USSR. What we are seeing is a feedback loop.

[–] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

The over quarter of a million casualties certainly isn’t helping them either

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Serbia thanks Russia for it's brain gain.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

If you are a college educated Russian reading this, please consider motivating all in your influence to move to another country that is not the Russian Federation

That sounds like a great way for a college educated Russian to get themselves locked up for decades. The better advice is to just get out without telling anyone you're planning to.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Terrible morrale, few people supporting the war, the rest forced into this stupid war and with the world donating their war tech to ukraine it would be hard to come out on top

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Russia filled a niche of cheaper AND no strings. Their arms exports have collapsed post Ukraine, but that's also partly because they've diverted arms to their own war effort.

China and India have largely picked up the slack, but I believe it's mostly China.

South Korea has also greatly expanded it's arms industry in the past decade, especially it's naval yards, but I think they mostly compete with Western firms.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, when anti-GPS and GPS collide, what do you expect?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

This guy physics's

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Annihilation?

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was the jammer just a coat hangar, 9v battery, and aluminum tape?

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, but there are actually very low very cost, extremely dangerous and illegal, jammers you can make with not too much more. Basically they just burst shitloads of electrical power into the air that jamm up a surprisingly broad range of nearby RF spectrum.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I bet the jammers were unsophisticated enough you could just program the GPS to continue moving in the direction where the over the air noise levels kept increasing.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

For all the legitimate criticisms of Russian military, their EW and Counter-EW capabilities are actually world class. Which is why it is a big deal when they're destroyed, or captured.

[–] Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depending on the range at which the signals start to become jammed, it could be possible to navigate solely by IMU for the final leg also.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This sounds like a gag from the Roadrunner cartoon.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago

I want to read that the GPS jammer killed the GPS on the bomb which continued flying in an unintended direction until accidentally hitting the jammer.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't a GPS jammer be targetted simply by anti-radiation missiles?!

In my ignorance I'm thinking of it as basically a single really powerful emitter in a certain range of frequencies which would really stand out with the appropriate frequency filter, plus it's not as if there would be any other ground-based emitters around in that range of frequencies as civilians for obvious reasons aren't supposed to be using devices which emit in that range (receive, sure, but not emit).

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Anti-radiation missles targett the high output of the RF spectrum used by radars, not those used by satellite navigation.

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A jammer will be a high output RF. The jammers just shout louder than the signals they want to jam to drown them out. This is wideband high gain noise that degrades the signal to noise ratio of the target signals.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plot twist: the bombs used GLONASS.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unlikely if it was a US provided munition.

That said, I generally assume that most English language articles use GPS as a stand-in for any GNSS constellation, regardless of which one, or combination of them, was actually used.

Although, there is a reason why the Russian pilots and drivers were photographed using off the shelf Garmin units... much like the rest of their military, GLONAS was a legacy Soviet project that hasn't been well maintained or updated well post collapse.

[–] BraveLittleToaster@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Second best army in Ukraine

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That "jammer" was definitely tampered with by the russkies' corruption and greed.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Tee hee.

To any troll farm workers: ask Putin how Democracy's dick tastes.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This title confused me, because A-GPS is also a thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Norgur@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like those bombs were wasted.

load more comments
view more: next ›