this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
59 points (89.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27480 readers
1641 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are lots of issues I have with them in terms of privacy, but I'm going to be very specific in asking about a certain situation and would prefer to stay on that topic if possible.

I have seen someone showing AI glasses which allow the wearer to cheat at chess. The glasses provide the wearer with computer engine moves, essentially making them unbeatable against even the strongest grand masters.

How can someone prevent this from happening, for example in a tournament match?

I don't consider this as being an issue at the highest level of professional play, but for club and casual players they might not have the resources to deal with this.

Currently the camera and/or screen information might be fairly obvious just by looking, but assuming technology improves this could become harder to detect.

Retrospectively, it would be easy to spot a cheater and correct results, however this still spoils things by having the cheating in the first place.

It isn't realistic to ask people to play without glasses, and I'm not aware of any way to stop cameras or ai from functioning.

So what can be done, if anything?

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Detonate a nuke at high altitude so the EMP waves would destroy any pesky AI chips all over the entire country, obviously. πŸ™„

[–] wolo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

silly idea: have a microwave on site, put players' glasses in there for a few seconds to nuke any sensitive electronics inside without causing damage to metal structural elements

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 37 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Simple. Replace the glasses with an anal buzzer. You'll be a chess master in no time!

Hans Niemann has joined the chat

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 54 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

They should use a Faraday cage. It doubles as a WWE steel cage if one is caught cheating.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 22 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Joking aside, chess engines can run on very little hardware. It's not out of the question that something like this might be entirely embedded soon enough.

The hardest part might be interpreting the board state.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

The hard part might be communication. It’s easy to consider a device that can play chess as getting smaller and easier to hide, even a camera getting too small to notice.

But how does the device tell you what to do. The heads-up display is obvious but you can probably take action against that. Or maybe a voice but EarPods are noticeable if you’re looking for them, and maybe hearing aids not allowed. But what’s even less conspicuous? This thread has people joking about vibrating anal plugs but you can imagine lots of possibilities for extremely discrete devices if you can figure out a way to communicate sufficiently. My example was going to be a ring

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You could offload that to a phone, though.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

AFAIK you are not allowed any kind of mobile devices during chess games.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Bluetooth has a pretty good range and low power consumption.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Ok but we were talking about a faraday cage scensrio.

[–] shadow_wanker@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

A phone up you ass, then you're good to go regardless of any cage.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 13 hours ago

I've been seeing this suggestion in various replies and it's got me thinking people are just seeking an excuse at this point. πŸ˜‚

[–] Mr_Blott 7 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Is WWE not wrestling? Not sure how barely-disguised gay porn is going to solve this

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 18 hours ago

barely-disguised gay porn

You're writing this as if it were a bad thing.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago

It's soap operas for men.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 20 hours ago

Considerable application of the choking aspect

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 19 hours ago

It's pretty obvious isn't it? 😁

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 34 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

How can someone prevent this from happening, for example in a tournament match?

If it's a tournament, I would consider this:

  1. Have a clear rule forbidding the use of AI and to wear AI-powered device, including glasses. With real sanctions.
  2. Have the judge check glasses (and phones and whatever) before each game.

If it's in a club, have the same rules with the sanction of expelling the cheater from the club. Temporary ban for a first time, perma ban starting with the second one.

As a chess player myself, I would also reconsider my habits, ie I may stop going to those clubs where the (stupid, literally) mentality to win at any cost would not be kept under tight control by the staff.

[–] Leeks@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

There are a couple avenues of attack:

  1. The camera- It the camera can’t see the board, it can’t provide moves. An IR blaster may be a valid tool to blind the camera, but not the player. This could be a battery and LED with a switch that is placed next to the board.
  2. The internet connection - If the AI can’t talk to where the processing is happening, it can’t get answers. Anything from a jammer to a metal cage would work here, but watch your legality.
  3. The device itself - anything to stop the device from working. This could be a EMP, but that’s rather non-selective.
  4. The board - limiting information from the board in a way humans can understand but AI currently can’t. This could be as simple as only showing half of a board at any time.

The IR blaster is likely your best bet, else it might be time for a ruling of β€œno electronic glasses at the board”.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago

Or the board could be disguised as something the camera doesn't recognize.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Besides legality on jammers, they tend to be area of effect. They also can do discreet frequencies.

The IR blaster and jammers are the best solutions as oing as you don't interfere with something like 911 and have signposts about usage.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 18 hours ago

An EMP destroys electronics, you probably don't want to go there over a board game.

If this becomes a tit-for-tat arms race then there's ways around IR blasters or jammers - an IR filter for the camera, optical networking for the jammer.

I think partially this depends on the circumstances. Is this some kind of million-dollar tournament game, or is it just people playing in the park? For big tournaments with serious money on the line, a lot of effort might be reasonable. For recreation, not so much.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Would doing something like disguising the chess pieces as Monopoly pieces or the board as a table design confuse the AI?

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think non standard pieces could be easily adapted to with ai, for example just by observing the start position :/

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

Disguise the positions then. Things I can see here include A) having a game where the assumed start positions aren't there and the pieces only enter the board upon their first move B) having a board where the squares detach into little islands but function the same C) playing without a board as if you had a board.

Everything mentioned could technically be tried. We're talking about a game people say they can play "in their heads" cries in aphantasia

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

IR LEDs are stupid cheap and easy to rig. I have a fat board of them I got for $7. Also have a couple of flashers that plug directly on top of a 9V battery.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

Currently the camera and/or screen information might be fairly obvious just by looking, but assuming technology improves this could become harder to detect.

Hard to answer if you're using something extremely hypothetical like this. If we don't know how that's supposed to work, we can't really come up with a feasible solution.

I suppose you could just set off a small EMP - surely if AI/screen tech is that small, EMP emitters would get miniaturized as well?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

EMPs are indiscriminate. They will affect all electronic devices in the range of the EMP. You don't want to take out a pacemaker.

Another commentor points towards IR blasters and jammers.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 21 hours ago

these are called jammers and are illegal for most of people (except like military or presidential detail)

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I just meant cameras could get smaller and be hard to see, likewise screens might become indistinguishable from glass. If you can't visually check, what can you do?

[–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You could require that players wear glasses of a certain kind: Eg transparent plastic frames, or fine wire frames which are too small to conceal any device.

[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

You certainly could depending on how casual this is. For just a small local thing, I'm probably not buying a second pair of glasses to make them feel better.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I think you can take inspiration from 2014. Just be annoying, stop these people and have a long and detailed conversation and taunt them. Do this constantly. It has already worked for those "glassholes" back then.

I mean these glasses are kind of obvious if you know what you're looking for. And still have big and clunky parts that look off. I think you'd have to familiarize yourself with how they look. But that's not too hard as there are very few models out there.

[–] Mr_Blott 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

And still have big and clunky parts that look off.

Fucking hell have you seen European women recently πŸ˜‚

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I mean pretty much all women I met IRL are European. I guess that trend didn't extend to my peer group yet. Yeah, maybe except for silly sunglasses. But I'd be wary immediately if someone didn't take those things off indoors πŸ˜†

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, maybe except for silly sunglasses. But I'd be wary immediately if someone didn't take those things off indoors πŸ˜†

Unless they're Bono.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

OP's premise is specifically that you cannot detect them easily at some point in the future. Are you planning on insulting every single person who wears prescription glasses?

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 points 20 hours ago

Oh fair enough. Guess you'd have to check people before a tournament then. It'd be similar and far easier than the Hans Niemann case in 2023. I suppose you can just demand everyone having their glasses looked at in some hypothetical future. That's far easier than checking if some sex toy is up their arse...

[–] blueamigafan@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

I think it would depend on the specs of the camera but what about an infra red torch or light, invisible to the naked eye it would blind and disrupt a camera so the computer can't see the moves

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe use pieces with nonstandard shapes, or colors?

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I think non standard pieces could be easily adapted to with ai, for example just by observing the start position :/

I also think it would be disruptive to the players. Especially tournaments require standard pieces.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

What about gold and silver pieces with mirror-like finishes? Their appearances would change with every move, as they reflect the different pieces around them.

[–] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

AI will likely register the board as chess or checkers then on the first few moves realize it's chess and begin narrowing down spaces with or without the reflections then displaying potential moves. A big issue with AI is its ability to adapt to new information.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Koen967@feddit.nl 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You could maybe provide glasses on venue. Have some different strength lenses ready to pop in a frame. That or just check the inside of the frame for the name of the glasses and check if it is AI powered.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Or just check to see if it has an integrated camera and the other tech. Pretty sure there are tools with sensors that could identify the electronics existing.