HikingVet

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 16 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Which would still violate the posse comitatus act

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt your conviction

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 18 hours ago

What's the highest level of education that you have achieved?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 19 hours ago

By the way you talk, you crumble if something isn't exactly the way you want it to be.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

Well, there are several methods:

*Cold turkey: just stop and ride it out. You can do things like chew gum to help deal with the cravings. *Medication: Talk to your doctor *The Patch: follow instructions on box. *Nicotine Gum: use as directed *Vape: not the best method, but works for people.

Not an exhaustive list

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

Did you forget /j?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Conventional weapons can reduce hoards to manageable amount. And a zombie dragging itself across the ground is much easier to deal with.

If I saw thousands of zombies, a machine gun is what I want. Aim head at the average head height, and make the barrels smoke. It's not suppressing fire, it's crowd management.

Remember you can spike a zombie on the ground easier than when they are standing. Immobilise, THEN neutralise.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Artillery and bombs can shred/destroy the body, making it hard to move, if there is enough body left to move.

A .50 to the arm isn't going to slow a zombie down, but the knee? Kinda hard to walk with one leg. 25mm chain gun is probably going to mist a few bodies.

Artillery is an area denial weapon. If you have a hoard a couple 105 shells are going to take apart rotten flesh with ease. Mortars are similar and more mobile.

Mine fields are effective as a way to immobilise and thin the herd.

Choke points work exceptionally well, and claymores can be rigged at head height.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If they are trying to protect women from "men" in sports shouldn't they prevent "women" playing with men? One would think they would be at the same risk...

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This sounds like a terrible bill. Also it's sexist as all fuck, why not prevent trans athletes in male sports as welll?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ah, yes, wasn't focused on that part. Pretty sure 1.3 billion would be most of both American continents.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Not all Billionaires are American.

492
Geology (lemmy.ca)
 
 

Now that I have beat it, I am just going to focus on getting my first century ride in before the weather gets shitty.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›