this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
436 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26862 readers
4015 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crafter72@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 36 minutes ago

Awh hell nah, no more JAAAAAAAAAAG :(

[–] tallpaul@lemm.ee 2 points 42 minutes ago

Skoda have done something similar with their latest offering. No Skoda badge, no radiator grill. Just SKODA in a boring font.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 27 minutes ago
[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 7 points 1 hour ago

The font is ugly.

[–] inbeesee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

They're trying to impress investors with 'serious' design, not stand out with a unique one

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 18 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

>New logo is soulless slop

Every single company

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 points 22 minutes ago

Makes it easier to forget them and not being able to keep them apart. That's really great for us. Less ads in our brains.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I read this as joguar when I first scrolled by.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I hate these new logos these corporations make, the old jaguar logo looked like power the new one looks like some weird startup.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

/uj Technically this is their new logo:

J a G U a r is just their new typeface (I think that’s the name?); and apparently/allegedly is to make the pronunciation closer to UK English, rather than American.

Either way, though - it’s still..

/j

..pReTtY fArKiN’ sToOoPiD.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 2 points 44 minutes ago

You spell stoopid with three O"s. Maybe your the stoopid,

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I would have guessed that was a Puma logo.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

You're making that up.

[–] Homescool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago
[–] EtAl_isGitch@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Their logo doesn't have a jaguar and their car commercial doesn't have any cars. Fuck it, whatever

[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

They went from luxury car company to mediocre smartphone brand

[–] yax@feddit.org 16 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)
[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, they really took their logo from sexy, fast and expensive looking, to looking like an over priced soft drink?

That's impressive, haha.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

It looks like an off brand sportswear shirt you'd find on an African market.

[–] max_dryzen@mander.xyz 20 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

GUys I'm from ~~2040~~ 2035, here's Microsoft's logo

MS corporate comms army did a sik job getting across those inscrutable monolith vibes, I bet when it launched they all clapped (even though clapping is in performance reviews)

BONUS: heres Amazon, Faceberg and Nvideo too (yay diversity)

spoiler

[–] Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

We've gone full circle again

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

You're all making fun of it but this new style did exactly what it intended to do. Everyone is talking about them now.

[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah, for a whole 2 hours, until everyone moves on to bitch about the next thing and then Jaguar are stuck with the shitty new logo no-one recognises for long after that.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 3 hours ago

If only they sold stuff that the people talking about it could afford in the first place, maybe that'd boost their sales.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 48 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I would have failed every design class I took in college if I submitted that. Why such wide kerning? Why lower case but upper G? Why so round? Why so completely unreadable at a distance because of micro serifs? There isn't one good design element in this.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It might just be depending on how far away you are

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think they want people to focus on the "agua" and the j and r are just little accents on it like its word art rather than a logo. Like, I literally picture the marketing weirdos at the meeting going off like this.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

The "a" is the worst part for me. You can't see those little stubbs at a distance. So it reads JoGuor at a distance. They didn't just fail to create a good logo, they failed to preserve the name. One bit of advice I always give is "imagine this logo on the back of a golf card or a Pride brochure. If the logo isn't crisp and readable in black and white in a 1/2 inch square then it sucks." This design fails that test. Not just because of the messed up "a" but the wide spacing makes those unreadable "a"s even smaller than if the letters weren't so widely spaced.

[–] nepenthes@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It doesn't say "car" at all either; no elegance or prestige. The old logo was sexy. New one looks like a logo for bottled water or something.

Edit: it's like going from James Bond to Austin Powers.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Austin Powers has style. Crazy 60s style but style.

[–] nepenthes@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Ya, I wanted to use a bland spy but there aren't any-- I was going to use the Spy vs Spy guys because they are the most generic-looking, but ultimately I kept Powers because while he is stylish and fun, he is also really immature and the logo looks immature to me.

[–] mister_flibble@lemm.ee 66 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I fucking hate this minimalist design trend more than it is probably reasonable to hate an aesthetic. It's got the personality of unfinished drywall.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly I think unfinished drywall has more personality. It’s utilitarian and rough around the edges, without the shiny surface veneer.

That new Jaguar logo is like somebody took a beautiful old house full of exposed brick and wood work and put a coating of white paint over everything.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

It should be those puprple and yellows of Corporate Memphis

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] m_f@midwest.social 79 points 18 hours ago (11 children)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 1 points 35 minutes ago (1 children)

What's the reasoning behind? Or just a trend?

[–] m_f@midwest.social 1 points 16 minutes ago

I think it's just a long-running trend across many different companies towards simplification. Here's the Apple logo for example:

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Slightly misleading without showing the color, only slightly though

[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Spotify and EBay made the right choices here, the new logos are way better.

[–] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It is subjective, I like the old eBay logo more, but dislike the old Airbnb one.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, they certainly fin in better with all the others.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

All these minimalist labels save .0005¢ every time they’re printed, probably even more on promo booths, banners, and the like.

[–] BrowseMan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Aaaah then indeed that makes sense (and this is not ironic).

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I wasn’t being entirely serious, though there is an element of truth to it. It probably is a measurable cost savings over the scale of the business.

I still think these unremarkable corporate logos are boring AF. Just makes them visually soulless along with just being corporate soulless.

[–] BrowseMan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

I completly agree these logos are boring. The brand lost so much character and flare.

However I totally see "cost less" as one of the reason why these changes were pushed (especially for clothing brands).

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›