this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
297 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3860 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And so it begins...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 15 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Let me get this right. So, you know exactly who this man is and what he stands for. Yet, you elect him anyway. You know he's been "joking" about this before. Yet, you elect him anyway. He's a convicted felon. Yet, you elect him anyway.

I've lost every smidgen of respect I had for Americans. You went into this with eyes wide open. You deserve what's coming.

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 13 points 54 minutes ago (2 children)

I voted for Kamala, and got a handful of others to as well, don't include me with the rest of them. I don't deserve this.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 4 points 40 minutes ago

Same. I voted on the first day of early voting, and convinced my nephew and his two best friends to cast their first (and likely last) votes. My niece is 15; I'm sure she'll be glad to hear she "deserves" what's coming.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 31 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, already in the first week. Expect to hear this joke periodically over the course of his term, each time getting slightly more seriously stated. By the third year, everyone will have heard it so much it'll be accepted as a perfectly reasonable idea. And the media will help that along in how they report on it. This is the tried and true playbook and it will work, not only for this plan but for their other plans.

Take for example the planned mass deportations. They'll start out with finding some people who have committed crimes (or they claim have), deport them and no one will object to that, it's already how it's done. As they move on to those whose crimes are not very consequential, like traffic tickets or whatever, if libs say anything against it, they'll pounce on it and amplify stories how the libs are overreacting and want criminals to be left free and have open borders. Harping on any criticism in cases that are technically justified is key to getting the public used to pooh-poohing any dissent as they start escalating and going after the law-abiding (other than being here illegally ofc) immigrants, families with mixed status members, DACA/Dreamers, parents of children born here and thus citizens and deporting the children with them, etc.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Ha such fun joke

Edit: also just boys being boys

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

He won't stay in power. His appointment of incompetent sycophants will dismantle 250 years of American prosperity (maliciously or negligently, it doesn't matter) and it will be sold for parts to billionaires and foreign states.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 hour ago

will dismantle 250 years of American prosperity

cough 1961 to 2008

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah; he’ll stay in power long enough for that.

But he’s 78 years old. When he’s supposed to step down in 2029, he’ll be almost 83.

The average life expectancy of men in the US is currently 73.

Based on historical data for people Trump’s age and health in the US, he’s likely to die of natural causes before he’s 86.

So the longest he could likely hang on for is one more term than he’s supposed to.

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I bet he wants nepotism to for succession, but that's not what his benifactors want, hence JD Vance

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, a "joke".

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 39 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Remember, the Constitution is just a really old piece of paper if the people entrusted to enforce it choose to ignore it.

There is a non-zero chance that Trump could move to suspend the Constitution entirely, backed by a complicit Cabinet, Congress, Supreme Court and several state governments. And at that point, we would literally have to hope and pray that the rank-and-file military is on the side of the people, which is far, far from guaranteed. Because if they're not, you can claim your Constitutional rights all you want, but you'll be doing it with the other prisoners inside of whatever re-education camp you're assigned to.

Heck, there's a non-zero chance that the American voter just gives off a collective "meh" and just apathetically lets Trump seize total power. We just saw a few million people do just that.

[–] Bonifratz@lemm.ee 92 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

Luckily, the process of repealing or changing an amendment likely won’t change anytime soon, even with a Republican trifecta at the federal level, as it requires overwhelming public support. As outlined in Article 5 of the Constitution, any such change requires at least two-thirds of the Senate and the House to agree on the modification, with that change then requiring ratification by a minimum of three-quarters of states in the nation.

I wouldn't be so confident. If the majority decides to ignore it, then a constitution suddenly holds very little weight. Remember how the Roman Empire was once a Republic, until someone decided it wasn't anymore? Remember how 1930s Germany was a democracy, until someone decided that had to end?

Trump might argue some weird logic regarding the 22nd and 12th amendment. Or he might just declare a state of national emergency because of a new migrant caravan or some such shit, and postpone elections indefinitely. If he tries anything of the sort, it will all come down to whose side the military is on.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 36 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

What happens if they declare all democrats are enemies of the state and remove them from office and put their people in?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 hour ago

You mean the thing that they literally told us they were going to do?

They didn't actually mean that...

[–] ziggurat@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

Project Gilead.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You’ll probably get to find out in January 😊 that’s kind of the whole plan

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

He’ll do what Putin did. Have Vance run as President, and run as his Vice-President. He’ll maintain control like Dick Cheney with Bush.

[–] firebyte@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Trump's malignant narcissism won't let him be subordinate to someone else. So that idea is out.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

That’s explicitly not allowed by the constitution. 12th amendment

[–] pornpornporn@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 hour ago

It's already established that the 14th amendment doesn't apply to him, so why would the 12th?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 hour ago

They. Do. Not. Care.

You still don't get this?

[–] rimmedalpha@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 9 hours ago

Yes, but the 28th Amendment written on this McDonald's napkin says he can totally do this.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 130 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tiita@lemmy.world 66 points 17 hours ago (7 children)

Not really.. This time America voted for the felon to become a dictator

And the felon will do whatever he can to make it happen.

Last time it was still a misguided presidency.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 68 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I hear ya, but I mean he 'joked' about it before this election too.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 54 points 16 hours ago (5 children)
[–] HocEnimVeni@lemmy.world 43 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Don't forget when he praised Xi Jinping for removing term limits and suggested he might do the same https://www.reuters.com/article/world/trump-praises-chinese-president-extending-tenure-for-life-idUSKCN1GG03P/

[–] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 37 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

He's also just explicitly said that he wants to be a dictator, but that apparently isn't a turn-off for much of his base, and in fact many of them see it as a positive: https://apnews.com/article/trump-hannity-dictator-authoritarian-presidential-election-f27e7e9d7c13fabbe3ae7dd7f1235c72

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 24 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

in the 10 minutes of the Rogan interview I could stomach he talked about how surreal it all was, how it was a joke, he didn't want to be a politician, and he didn't expect to win.

He was expecting it this time and he knows what he can get away with.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know how anyone could be impressed by that interview. It was 3 hours of a narcissist saying how great he is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 70 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 3PO40K@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You would think they would figure it out right? It's not a joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 22 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Ben Shapiro is a hypocritical piece of shit. Sorry that might not be relevant.

[–] TurnpikeRangers@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

Nah, that's always relevant

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jerakor@startrek.website 49 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

He is 78, in awful health, and has no interest in a legacy or supporting a successor. He keeps everyone around him at odds and maintains enough infighting that no clear heir apparent could really show up.

So like, he really only will hold power long enough to make everything terrible. So we got that goin for us.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 hour ago

It will definitely be interesting to see at which stage each "well, maybe it won't be that bad" people realize that, yes. It will.

[–] minnow@lemmy.world 46 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

You know how long Caesar was dictator for life before he was assassinated? Less than a year.

But the damage was done, and Rome had a civil war over whether it would go back to being a Republic like it had been or if it would have an autocratic ruler. Obviously, the latter won out.

A lesson from history.

[–] jerakor@startrek.website 26 points 15 hours ago

Let's not lump Trump in with Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar was a war hero and a capable leader who's final crimes were giving out citizenship and housing.

Trump's final crimes will be giving all our state secrets to every other government in the world and obliterating our infrastructure.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Ravenzfire@lemmy.ml 9 points 12 hours ago

Jk, jk...unless...

load more comments
view more: next ›