T00l_shed

The way israel will commit acts of terrorism because there may be hezbola, and civilian bystanders are "acceptable" because they are "targeting" hezbola, or Hamas. It is seen as "ok" by some because "Hamas or Hezbola". When Hamas or hezbola launch rockets into israel to "target" Israeli combatants, on the clock or off, those acts of terror are considered the worst thing, and it continues the circle of violence.

It's pointing out the hypocrisy, that is all.

I don't ascribe to it.

Hmmm I guess with Israel having a conscript army then rocket barrages aren't acts of terrorism. If a large portion of the country is considered "combatants" then any non-coms can be written off as "acceptable collateral damage".

Just a little light crippling, don't worry about the other 2700 other people that suddenly need the hospital, oh wait, some bombs went off there as well!

"Not like that"™

I mean, bibi seems to have the US by the short and curlies. I have no doubt that if things got spicy enough the US would gladly send boots on the ground to die for Israel's actions. I could even imagine bibi saying "oh we're so hurt, you guys do this, and we will stay back to defend our territory" while some poor schmuck from winsconsin gets exploded by an ied.

No, I'm not calling all acts of war terrorism, or all terrorism acts of war. For example, Ukranian artillery striking Russian troops in a trench most certainly an act of war, and not terrorism. Detonation explosives attached to people who aren't aware, who are potentially innocent, potentially in crowded locations, in hospitals, or schools, isn't an act of war, and is text book terrorism.

Are you living in some bizaroworld were wide spread terrorist attacks are ok?

Bingo.

Congrats on wining gold in the mental gymnastics competition.

Is it precise? From the pager terror attacks only 9 or killed, maybe 2 of them "fighters", at least 1 child, 2700+ wounded including medical staff and other innocent people. That's not exactly precise in my books.