this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
1048 points (90.7% liked)

tumblr

3446 readers
1041 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] corus_kt@lemmy.world 62 points 6 months ago (20 children)

As a foreigner I never understood the novote sentiment in the US. You aren't voting for either candidate because you dislike them, so who would you actually vote for? AOC? RFK Jr? Bernie? Does your ideal candidate even exist in reality yet? All a no vote does is take away your own rights in your country, while the rest of the world moves on without you.

For what it's worth, both parties can be trash but one party actually can be shamed to doing the right thing once in a while.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago

Non voters are either children or morons.

Rational adults realise that this is the system and you have to operate inside of it despite the compromises.

Now, you want to start changing the system, start a grassroots campaign, get into politics to change the system, more power to you!

But sitting on your ass crying about both sides while doing nothing, you are simply an immature moron.

[–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I cannot blame people for feeling jaded or disillusioned. Would we vote for Bernie? We certainly would've if the DNC didn't provably sabotage his campaign. And I cannot ignore that Biden is old and deeply unpopular among leftists, yet our party refuses to offer up a better choice because they're counting on "the devil you know" to carry him through. Who could feel enthusiastic about that? I think the hope is that the DNC will learn some kind of lesson if he loses, though I know they won't. The trend of "reduce harm now, actually improve things later" has been going on for a long time. When is "later"? What up and coming voice on the democratic side do we have to look forward to?

I have to vote, because my number one priority is trans rights and there's only one party that will do anything to protect that, but I don't do it happily. I understand too that the "vote blue no matter who" crowd has similar pressing concerns that require harm reduction. But I dislike the characterization of anyone who feels apathetic about the upcoming election as idiots or Russian bots. When you're only voting against a candidate, it's hard to feel motivated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm with you. I love everything George Carlin did, except for his anti vote bits. Somehow voting is supposed to make you compliant in the current going on in government, is the argument.

The only way to change things is too consistently vote until the baby boomers are thinned out of their electoral advantage.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 11 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Carlin isn't wrong on the crucial parts.

The system is broken and cannot be fixed by voting. It must be dismantled and replaced.

But while we get started on the dismantling and replacing, maybe vote so that the current system doesn't deteriorate, break down and gets replaced by something worse before you have the chance to bring about meaningful and positive change.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 57 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • Leftists are abandoning Joe Biden and this will ensure Donald Trump's victory

  • Actually, Joe Biden is very popular and he's going to win in a landslide. Anyone who says otherwise is a Russian shill.

Rolling these two ideas in my brain like a pair of baoding balls

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (26 children)

Where have you heard the second one? I don't think I've ever heard anyone say that.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (11 children)

It's legitimately possible the left abandons him and he picks up enough conservatives to win anyways.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They're called Benoit balls

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Sorry, I can't even say it without adding "balls". Physically impossible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 45 points 6 months ago (8 children)

The situation is actually quite simple.

If you want Palestine to survive, your best bet is to vote Biden.

Literally every other option will only lower their chances. You can't have everything you want, welcome to life.

"Genocide Joe" doesn't matter when the other option is Turbo Genocide Donny.

So if there is anyone who tries to convince you to not vote Biden, they either want Palestine to die, or want to cause chaos in your country. Which is most likely a Russian bot.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Having standards is a bad thing, just vote for your team even if you'd hate what they do.

Republicans did that decades ago, and now have trump.

The only thing stupider than them doing it, is all the "moderates" saying it's easier to convince millions of people to follow them off the cliff than convince the DNC to start running candidates that Dem voters want to vote for...

The fact that trump has won 50% of his elections and looks to be 2/3 in a few months should make everyone reconsider the quality of candidates we're running against him.

Not getting mad at the people honest about the situation while there's still time to do literally anything to prevent trump.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 43 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The fact that trump has won 50% of his elections and looks to be 2/3 in a few months should make everyone reconsider the quality of candidates we’re running against him.

After the Dems last lost an election, you got Biden as your next candidate. Why are you expecting this approach to suddenly produce a candidate you would like?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)

I don't, that's my point.

"Blue no matter who" always ends up with candidates more conservative than we want.

So even like in 2020 where we all and together and get a Dem president, House, and Senate, nothing gets done.

Because too many Dem incumbents just don't agree with the party platform.

The only time the party pushes is when progressives try to have standards.

The only result is the party keeps getting more and more conservative. It's not a valid long term strategy

[–] Skua@kbin.social 39 points 6 months ago (28 children)

I think you've misunderstood me. Last time the Democrats lost an election, you got Joe Biden as the next candidate. Why would making the Dems lose this election produce a more progressive candidate?

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Republicans did that decades ago, and now have trump.

I might argue that Republicans didn't do that decades ago, and that's how they got two Bushes, a McCain, and a Romney. It wasn't until they abandoned the "electable" moderate Republican and embraced their ideological id that they got to their political messiah.

The fact that trump has won 50% of his elections and looks to be 2/3 in a few months should make everyone reconsider the quality of candidates we’re running against him.

I gotta say, I noticed the folks running in the GOP field and they all sucked hard. Trump was the raw meat candidate, but he wasn't even the most fascist asshole on the ballot. DeSantis was the guy who got off waterboarding people at Gitmo for a living. Hailey couldn't name a country she didn't want to bomb. Hutchinson's fundie base would have him rounding up the cast of RuPaul's Drag Race and marching them to the gas chambers. Only Ramaswamy is the kind of sociopath business conservative more fixated on looting the country than mutilating its residents.

Trump's given them license to go full mask-off, but he's not uniquely bad. He's emblematic of a party that's also frothed with bigotry, and just found a PC way of displaying it right up until a black man got into the White House.

Not getting mad at the people honest about the situation while there’s still time to do literally anything to prevent trump.

Biden won 2020 by 40,000 votes across three major swing states. He's losing all three - PA, GA, and AZ - by two to three times that under current polling. The theory that we can just Tinkerbell him back into a second term is simple cope. Biden's goose was cooked as soon as he fumbled the bag in his first 100 days.

Blaming 20-something tech savvy voters on Lemmy for hating the man over his genocidal support of Israel won't shift any of the critical swing-state 40-something blue collar voters angry at him over sun-setting all the COVID era public spending measures.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Jokes on you. I'm trying to vote for the big dawg.

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I know I have no way of convincing anyone of this, but I am not a Russian bot (living in the UK and not being able to vote in the US election).

But these are exactly the points of view I have been expressing over here about the Tory and Labour parties. Maybe not so much the "not voting at all" one but the other three? Yeah -- that sounds a lot like me right now.

(I think you should vote for someone you believe in, rather than voting for someone who is not someone else, if that makes sense)

But definitely not a Russian bot :)

[–] Skua@kbin.social 56 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I think you should vote for someone you believe in, rather than voting for someone who is not someone else

This would be the ideal situation, but for so long as we have first-past-the-post it's a fundamentally ineffective way to vote. Thanks to Duverger's law, unless one of the two big parties just so happens to coincide with your views then the best you can do is to vote against whichever of the big two you dislike most. "Big two" here depends on your constituency - it may not be Labour and the Conservatives locally, but it is true that virtually every constituency has at most two realistic options. Labour may not be very good, but if they're in power it's probably at minimum going to make this a better place for asylum seekers and trans people (or whoever the Tories would go after next), and Labour's voting record on the environment really is far better than the Conservatives' too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zorque@kbin.social 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Well as long as you have your pride as the world burns down around you :)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 10 points 6 months ago

Can’t believe it took this long for me to see this meme. Plenty of photos of internet soldiers, but haven’t seen it memes till now.

[–] sibannac@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I did voter drives in 2016 and 2020 The people I met say the same things. I am in now way saying that voter interference is not a thing. Encouraging voter apathy is a easy way to influence American elections.

load more comments
view more: next ›