this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
1048 points (90.7% liked)

tumblr

3446 readers
940 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I know I have no way of convincing anyone of this, but I am not a Russian bot (living in the UK and not being able to vote in the US election).

But these are exactly the points of view I have been expressing over here about the Tory and Labour parties. Maybe not so much the "not voting at all" one but the other three? Yeah -- that sounds a lot like me right now.

(I think you should vote for someone you believe in, rather than voting for someone who is not someone else, if that makes sense)

But definitely not a Russian bot :)

[–] Skua@kbin.social 56 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think you should vote for someone you believe in, rather than voting for someone who is not someone else

This would be the ideal situation, but for so long as we have first-past-the-post it's a fundamentally ineffective way to vote. Thanks to Duverger's law, unless one of the two big parties just so happens to coincide with your views then the best you can do is to vote against whichever of the big two you dislike most. "Big two" here depends on your constituency - it may not be Labour and the Conservatives locally, but it is true that virtually every constituency has at most two realistic options. Labour may not be very good, but if they're in power it's probably at minimum going to make this a better place for asylum seekers and trans people (or whoever the Tories would go after next), and Labour's voting record on the environment really is far better than the Conservatives' too.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Well as long as you have your pride as the world burns down around you :)

[–] pop@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 months ago

It's already burning, and you're actively participating in one, if you haven't noticed. But hey, my teams going to keep it under controI, the people dying are not even white, so it's cool.

It's optimal for US to come out as fascist and remove all doubts, so that rest of the world can move away from appeasing a military complex disguised as a country. The civilized world will deal with it.

People actually believe that country that actively supports current and harbors past war criminals is the one that's keeping the world from burning. No, you're just like Russia and China with good PR.

But you can't make any more arguments without moving to hypothetical bullshit, deflection, personal attacks and whataboutism from brainwashing, so I won't fault you.

-Signed, Pick your flavor of bots (Russian/Chinese/NK/Iran/Cuba/Aliens) you like and feel better about yourself

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

well that's because labor did become much more similar to the tories with that cunt blair when thatcher was in office, didn't it? the difference isn't as small in the us, however disappointing it might be.

democrats are center right but not straight up fascist as the republican party is today.

at the very least they're trailing behind the population when it comes to social justice. the republicans are completely against anyone except straight cis white males having any rights.

they talk about trans people a lot but they already started taking women's rights away. who's safe? gays? black people? leftists? you can say both parties are disappointing but it's a joke to say they are "the same."

also AOC talking about the election last time had a good argument for Biden despite her differences: forget who you support. but who do you think will be more responsive to arguments and protests? if it's Biden, you might or might not pressure him to do some things. if it's the other guy, you know he will not listen.

the exception seems to be genocide unfortunately, but it won't be better under the guy who triggered and facilitated all of this while he was in the office in the first place.

and I'm sorry but you can't expect the democrats to come to their senses on their own. if you think not voting for them will suddenly make them think they should appeal more to the left, historically you've been wrong; the only lesson they learn is that they should appeal more to the right because the right is winning despite being a minority. that's how their deteriorating minds work.