this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
152 points (95.8% liked)

World News

2301 readers
83 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WayeeCool@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I immediately went to the sections on these two topics and was not disappointed.

Rampant US Theft of Intellectual Property and Data

The U.S. frequently accuses other members of stealing its intellectual property. However, in fact, the U.S. has been stealing other members’ trade secrets, data and undisclosed information through various means for a long time, seriously violating TRIPS Agreement’s basic principles on intellectual property protection, failing to fulfill its obligations under Article 39 of the TRIPS Agreement on the protection of undisclosed information, and posing a serious threat to the national or regional security of the victim members.

With a wide range of targets and high frequency of attacking, cyber attacks and telephone surveillance are major methods for the U.S. to steal other members’ secrets, data and information. According to statistics results from National Computer Network Emergency Response Technical Team/Coordination Center of China, in the first half of 2021, the center captured about 23.07 million malicious program samples, with daily average transmission exceeding 5.82 million times, involving about 208,000 malicious program families, about half of which originated from the U.S. In September 2022, Northwestern Polytechnical University of China was attacked by the U.S. National Security Agency. The university’s core technical data, including critical network device configuration, network management data and operation and maintenance data, were stolen during the attack. Investigations have unveiled that the U.S. used 41 special cyber attack weapons for the attack. What’s more, the Tailored Access Operations under the U.S. National Security Agency has carried out tens of thousands of malicious cyber attacks on cyber targets in China over the years, taking control of relevant network equipment and obtaining large amounts of data. According to reports, the U.S. has also conducted monitoring and information theft of global broadcasting, telecommunications, and the Internet through related intelligence-gathering projects.

Rampant US Biopiracy

American biotechnology companies are notorious for their rampant engagement in “biopiracy”. Relying on its economic and technological advantages, American biotechnology companies commercially exploit genetic resources obtained at low cost from developing countries and apply for patent protection, so as to gain huge profits. In 1997, an agriculture enterprise in the U.S. applied for 20 patents after hybridizing basmati rice with an American long indica rice, which severely restricted the export of basmati rice from India. The top agriculture enterprises of the U.S. took advantage of the ineffective enforcement of international intellectual property rules and the weakness of developing members in the protection and utilization of intellectual property rights, wantonly stealing biological genetic resources, appropriating a large number of local excellent crop trait genes of developing members. For example, the U.S. applied a large number of patents around the world on the genes for high-yield traits of soybeans originating from China, and then monopolized the market by abusing its technology and market advantages. After the completion of patent registration, the U.S. agriculture enterprises in turn charged high patent fees from many members, including the members where the patented genetic resources originating from. Such biopiracy conduct seriously damages the intellectual property rights and food security of the developing members.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As always, US doing the things it accuses China of.

[–] MelianPretext@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

American biotechnology companies commercially exploit genetic resources obtained at low cost from developing countries and apply for patent protection, so as to gain huge profits.

Meanwhile on CNN today: "China’s sitting on a goldmine of genetic data – and it doesn’t want to share" https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/11/china/china-human-genetic-resources-regulations-intl-hnk-dst/index.html

[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That headline makes it sounds like the US wants to grind the Chinese populace up into genetic slop and use it to produce soylent green or something.

[–] Eat_Yo_Vegetables69@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Or the US want to use that data to create bioweapons to target specific peoples, sounds about right since they absorbed not only nazi scientists but also members of the infamous unit 731 post ww2

[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that sort of dystopian sci-fi tech is completely unfeasible though. People just aren't different enough genetically (and our immune systems aren't different enough) that any attempt at creating a supervirus that infects only a single ethnic group just flat out wouldn't work, and would just target people indiscriminately.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, but the way defense procurement works they could probably make billions of dollars on the grift that they can make a genetically targetable virus. Just look at those ridiculous Littoral Combat Ships that are being decommissioned only a few years after rolling out of the shipyard.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

I think the US would settle for just grinding the populace up, tbh

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

anakin-padme-2 Good thing the WTO is fair and balanced and will definitely act on this information in good faith and the US's credibility and standing will be damaged!

anakin-padme-3

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a bit too on the nose:

Under this Act, if the country does not operate on market principles of cost and pricing structures, and sales of merchandise in such country do not reflect the fair value of the merchandise, such country shall be determined as a “NME country”. [...] But in November 2022, the U.S. changed its determination and considered Russia a “NME country”. [...] In October 2017, the DOC re-determined China as a “NME” [...]

[–] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Oh come on NME are you fucking kidding me

[–] TheKanzler@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Non-market Economy"

It's a coincidence this time around

Yeah I knew what it meant but holy shit that’s one you should reword to get a different acronym

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But why pick those words as opposed to a "controlled market economy" or something?

[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Red scare propaganda. "Non Market Economy" sounds like communism. And the acronym is just a bonus.

[–] WaterBowlSlime@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 year ago

If this was in a story I'd think it was hamfisted omg

[–] M68040@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

The worst Rise of The Triad boss

[–] SovietyWoomy@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

If those Americans could read, they'd be very upset

[–] T34@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 year ago

"That's why we call it the rules-based order, sweaty!"