this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
387 points (97.8% liked)

World News

38987 readers
3299 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A cargo ship that was struck by a Houthi ballistic missile on Monday has created an 18-mile long oil slick in the Red Sea as it continues to take on water, two US officials said Friday.

The M/V Rubymar — a Belize-flagged, UK-registered, Lebanese-owned vessel — was carrying 41,000 tons of fertilizer when it was struck on Monday by one of two ballistic missiles fired from Houthi territory in Yemen.

US Central Command said the ship is currently anchored as it takes on water. “The Houthis continue to demonstrate disregard for the regional impact of their indiscriminate attacks, threatening the fishing industry, coastal communities, and imports of food supplies,” US Central Command said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] livus@kbin.social 98 points 8 months ago (31 children)

This is especially annoying because 6 months ago there was an amazing collaboration between both sides in the Red Sea to enable an international team to remove oil from a wrecked tanker.

All the people involved thought it was a great framework for more peaceful negotiations.

But now Israel has got its genocide on the Houthis are kicking off and saving the environment is no longer anyone's priority.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago (24 children)

Israel is guilty for what it’s doing, but blaming Israel for these Houthi attacks is ridiculous.

The Houthis are self serving in these attacks. As they have claimed land, support has turned against them because it turns out they suck at providing services to the people that live in areas they control. So they are falling back to the one popular policy they have: supporting Palestinians, and fighting back against “imperialists.”

Except attacking ships in the Red Sea is doing nothing for the Palestinians. Maybe if they only targeted Israeli vessels of ships heading to/from there, but they are not. Even getting bombed has an upside as it reinforces their underdog anti-imperialist messaging.

[–] livus@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

@derf82 I'm not "blaming Israel" for decisions taken by the Houthis. I don't really get why you'd take that from my comment.

Israelis made their own decisions.

Houthis proceeded to make their own decisions about how to respond to that too. I have no doubt that they are pursuing an agenda.

And the ecology of the Red Sea is no longer a priority for most people in the region because everyone has to make decisions based on what's happening.

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

they have claimed land,

fighting back against “imperialists.”

Hey, I think I know how they can do that basically for free!

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] JustUseMint@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Hit em with the old "proportional response" CENTCOM

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 29 points 8 months ago (22 children)

The Houthis have been ridiculous about their justifications for attacks, but where was this ship headed? It doesn't say in the article.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Double disaster. The leaking petroleum is an obvious problem, but the nitrogen in the fertilizer will really fuck some things up too. Wonder if will make a giant dead zone.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 4 points 8 months ago

That's going to fuck up the entire ecosystem if it does cause a giant bloom. Bad for fishing, too.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A cargo ship that was struck by a Houthi ballistic missile on Monday has created an 18-mile long oil slick in the Red Sea as it continues to take on water, two US officials said Friday.

The M/V Rubymar — a Belize-flagged, UK-registered, Lebanese-owned vessel — was carrying 41,000 tons of fertilizer when it was struck on Monday by one of two ballistic missiles fired from Houthi territory in Yemen.

“The Houthis continue to demonstrate disregard for the regional impact of their indiscriminate attacks, threatening the fishing industry, coastal communities, and imports of food supplies,” US Central Command said.

One of the US officials said the threat of more Houthi attacks in the Red Sea, combined with the condition of the water, makes it incredibly difficult to safely get to the ship and attempt to tow it to a port.

The damage sustained by the Rubymar is potentially the most significant to a vessel caused by an attack launched by the Houthis, who have been targeting commercial shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden for months.

The Houthis’ attacks have been ongoing for months, and despite several rounds of strikes by the US and UK on their capabilities, US officials told CNN it’s unclear how much weaponry the militia group still has.


The original article contains 606 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

Boy I sure am glad that I've completely removed 99% of consumerist plastic from my life, never get take out, and heavily reduced my meat intake in order to help the environment.

load more comments
view more: next ›