this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
1106 points (97.6% liked)

News

23440 readers
2926 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oliver made the proposal on Sunday’s episode of his HBO show Last Week Tonight, saying the supreme court justice had 30 days to accept or it would expire.

The British-born comedian’s offer came after a steady drumbeat of media investigations in the previous several months established that Thomas failed to disclose that political benefactors bought him lavish vacation travel and real estate for his mother. Thomas also failed to disclose – as required – that he allowed school fees for a family member to be paid off and had been provided a loan to buy a luxury motor coach, all after openly complaining about the need to raise supreme court justices’ salaries.

As a result, Thomas’s impartiality came into question after he sided with the contentious ruling that eliminated the federal abortion rights once provided by the Roe v Wade case.

He also recently listened to arguments over whether Donald Trump can be removed from states’ ballots in the presidential election after the former president’s supporters – whom he told to “fight like hell” – staged the January 6 attack at the US Capitol in Washington DC. Thomas resisted pressure to recuse himself from such matters, even though his wife, Ginni Thomas, is a conservative political activist who has endorsed false claims from Trump and his supporters that the 2020 election he lost to Joe Biden was stolen from him.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 116 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We don’t deserve John Oliver. He is too good and pure.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm convinced that Stewart retired cause Oliver stole the source of his power when he left TDS to go to HBO.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’d agree but. Stewart had a much harder job multiple days of the week imo. Oliver gets a week to really write gold. So Stewart still goated imo. Or his writing team was lol

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Oliver's team can spend months researching and writing individual episodes. They don't cram those main segments into a single week of writing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheDannysaur@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Then how do you explain his return to TDS?

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Stewart can only do Mondays because that's when he can borrow the funny stone

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Oliver uses its power on sunday, then sleeps.

Stewart sneaks in to steal a fragment of it before the HBO attack drones catch him. Hence only on mondays, cause he expends the energy before tuesday and cant get more until the next sunday

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It was either that or run for office and Stewart would apparently rather die than accept the biggest landslide victory of our time.

It's actually terrifying how amazing he'd be as an ideal president, he's a man who knows how to put forward a best face for an executive team specialized in different areas of preference and expertise, and he knows how to spot good talent too, that's literally the two most important things a president needs to be good at, everything else is set dressing as long as you know how to spot folks for your team that know their shit, and know how to translate that shit to a lay-audience.

Obama got astonishingly little done, but the guy knew how to make a big deal out of what he did get done, he rode Obamacare and killing Bin Laden like he'd been retiring bulls and broncos his whole damn life! Which he kinda had to because 2010 happened.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 83 points 9 months ago (19 children)

I'm just annoyed HBOMax is now delaying pushing John Oliver's segments to YouTube but I guess it was inevitable...

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 34 points 9 months ago

Ah that's why it didn't show up yet. Enshittyfication.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] garretble@lemmy.world 80 points 9 months ago

I’m stealing this joke from someone I saw on bluesky or Masto (I forget), but:

Why would he take a pay cut?

[–] KursoryGlance@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thomas is just going to use this to negotiate better pay from his existing benefactors...

[–] Xavier@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is fine too. Better be more expensive for them.

However, I'm rather inclined to suspect that they have enough "blackmail" over the course of his life's proclivity (including some before he even became a judge) hence money is probably not going to sway him that much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I’ll be surprised if he doesn’t take it.

  • It’s likely a bigger bribe than he’s already getting.
  • He’s old and probably tired of working.
  • it’s an election season and republicans will just stall any new appointments to replace him until after the election.
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Republicans are not in charge of the Senate.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] nomous@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Yeah cash is great but power is its own thing and attracts money all by itself. Why sell a guaranteed legacy, a guaranteed mention in history books for a couple mil?

He doesn't need paychecks from a comedian, he can get all the paychecks he wants. Quietly, from men in expensive clothes at nice resorts on vacations he's not paying for. Followed by a wink and a nudge.

This priest is becoming especially troublesome.

[–] joenforcer@midwest.social 10 points 9 months ago

Are you joking?

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 9 points 9 months ago

The money probably isn't most of it. Thomas likes the power. He could make more in Congress through insider trading and bribes and then retire. Fucko likes putting his dick on the scale of history to hurt the kind of people he's used to be: poor.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I don't think he'll take it, not because he doesn't want to, but he's acutely aware that public confidence in the judicial system right now is at the lowest it has ever been. Accepting this deal would do even further damage to the image of the court's impartiality and his own legacy. It would send a message to the nation that the US Supreme Court seats can be bought and have a price, even if they are technically not allowed to accept bribes or gifts for favorable rulings.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago

The hero we want and need. Bless you John Oliver!

[–] Vlarbgersplah@lemmy.ml 46 points 9 months ago

Even if this did top his current bribes, I can't seem him walking away from the power.

[–] SloppyPuppy@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Just fundraise like 100 mil to get trump out of the race. Totally worth it and hes gonna take it with both hands.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 59 points 9 months ago (3 children)

He'd take the money and stay in the race

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 15 points 9 months ago

Yeah. He'd just fight the suit in court for years. And then when ordered to repay her could and have lived off they interest if they didn't somehow seize it into escrow.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

You put it in an escrow account with the condition being that he drops out to get it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is very interesting. With all the crowd funding methods, would it be theoretically possible to put something like this together? Granted, the person has to accept, but imagine being able to pay a politician to just disappear.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If it were to actually happen, it'll just open up a trend of people joining politics and being major asswipes with the sole intention that people buy them out

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You speak as if this isn't already happening. Rich corporations hire former US reps and regulators to be "lobbyists" for huge paychecks, but they aren't really asked to do anything--the real job happens before the big paycheck while the rep is still in office greasing the wheels, knowing retirement will be easy street.

Meanwhile scoundrels at every level are being loud public fuckheads so they can make a big name and sell books, or merch. They're getting paid too.

And these aren't even the real monsters. The real monsters are the ones who aren't doing it for money but for more political power.

Honestly, we should be so lucky as to have a way to buy the political fortunes of these pieces of shit before they have any political influence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Yes, but Trump isn't the only problem we're facing. And a lot of the other problems have a path through the supreme court. Let's do both.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I didn't realize the show was back. Outstanding work. The Trump-packed courts are the reason I don't think the USA can be fixed during my lifetime and will only get worse.

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Trump had nothing to do with Clarance Thomas, he's been in since the 90s

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 26 points 9 months ago

Trump put 3 of his own on it tho.

[–] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I saw this last night! ROFL! John Oliver kept asking how it was legal for him to make the offer! lol. I kinda hope Justice Thomas takes the offer.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Contracts can do pretty much anything legal. This is offering money to not work and penalties for this round be repayment. So there isn't a lot of risk involved at long as someone doesn't try to screw to receiver through bad contractual language.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 months ago

John was aiming more for the "I can bribe a SCOTUS judge to quit the court and not get into trouble???" part of it.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Cool, but the Republicans would just block any appointments until after the election, like they did with Garland.

[–] HighElfMage@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Only the Senate gets to block appointments like that, and Democrats control the Senate.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Until the usual two republicans-but-only-not-in-name block it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Not a chance. That recipient of dei benefits believes he is entitled to tell us what to do forever.

load more comments
view more: next ›