this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
250 points (97.7% liked)

News

23274 readers
4465 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

United Airlines has found loose bolts and other parts on 737 Max 9 plug doors as it inspects its fleet of Boeing jets following the Friday rapid depressurization aboard an Alaska Airlines jet of the same make, according to three people familiar with the findings.

The discrepant bolts and other parts on the plug doors have been found on at least five aircraft, one of the people told The Air Current.

A Boeing representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokeswoman for the Federal Aviation Administration declined to comment on the United findings, and pointed to the agency’s earlier statements.

United confirmed the findings in a statement, saying, “Since we began preliminary inspections on Saturday, we have found instances that appear to relate to installation issues in the door plug – for example, bolts that needed additional tightening. These findings will be remedied by our Tech Ops team to safely return the aircraft to service.”

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 54 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Planes nosediving because they incorrectly think they're stalling, bolts randomly falling out of critical hardware.. sounds like I'm not flying Boeing anytime soon.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I've heard Europe has more stringent quality standards. Wonder if Airbus is held to a higher standard.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I've always had the impression that airbus is much less in the news, which is probably a good sign.

Plus generally bean counter MBAs don't have quite the authority over engineers as they do in America.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

From my experience as a mechanical engineer, the quickest way to ruin a product, brand, and eventually company is to get those MBAs and finance-types in charge over the engineers.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

In theory Transport Canada has one of, if not the strictest standard in the world but they automatically approve anything approved by the FAA and the FAA's approval process is getting messy...

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 45 points 10 months ago (2 children)

if they found issues besides what they were looking for while inspecting a specific area, imagine what a full inspection could bring. yikes.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Didn't they find a LADDER inside the vertical stabilizer of a newly delivered boing aircraft a while back?

EDIT: Yep it was a ladder inside 787:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/28/business/boeing-787-dreamliner-investigation.html

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 9 points 10 months ago
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

Fod (foreign object debris) is one of the largest threats to aircraft. Need to keep very good track of everything.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

And of course it's at the non-union South Carolina plant, not the union Washington plant.

[–] Sharpiemarker@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] GombeenSysadmin 9 points 10 months ago

Oh shit it’s the casting mount, not the hinge retaining bolt. That’s 99% certain to be Boeing’s fault, not the airline. They’re going to try to say it was the airline because they opened the door to install the WiFi, but they wouldn’t have touched that bolt.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Between this shit and the whole counterfeit airplane maintenance parts, my trust is wavering

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What about the outsourced flight control software built by first year software engineers (at best)? Was that Boeing?

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

What about Starliner, the human rated spacecraft that is (currently) 6 years late? Was that Boeing?

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Boeing stock is gonna drop like a motherfucker again tomorrow lol.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Kinda like a plane coming in for an emergency landing because it's fucking door fell out.

[–] Vash63@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

More like one using a faulty autopilot

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do we know when the plug doors are installed? Is it in the main factory, or at a later finishing stage? If it's later, hopefully the issue is contained to those facilities. Otherwise, they're looking at serious general quality questions.

[–] GombeenSysadmin 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They’re installed by Spirit who manufacture the airframes, which are then shipped to Seattle for assembly with the wings. No-one will have removed those bolts since manufacture. There no need to touch those bolts for the mechanics to open the door, so the airline opening it to install the WiFi seems like a red herring.

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean Spirit manufacturers the airframe? Spirit is an airline, Boing is the manufacturer, right? I thought all Spirit does is maintenance.

[–] Cheesus@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Spirit AeroSystems not Spirit Airlines

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Awesome! Thanks for the clarification, I was clearly mixed up. And thanks to the downvoter who clearly dislikes idiots like me. :)

[–] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As companies make profit their number one priority, we will be seeing much more of this kind of thing ... that is until inspections are cut back in the name of profit.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Some dumbass executive:

"We need to show our investors more profit, why is the quality control expense so large? We haven't had quality control issues in years, slash it!"

[–] ahriboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

People might boycott 737 MAX unless Boeing addresses the problems seriously. I would take extra precaution if I board a 737 MAX. Airbus models seem better in quality than Boeing's.