this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
88 points (98.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26279 readers
1465 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As a hypothetical, say it became easy to grab water from objects in space and then move it places that needed (Africa / the gulf). What would the end results be for the global climate over time? Would you just end up with a flooded earth? Would temperatures rise or fall as time goes on?

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://calculatedearth.com/ allows you to see what would be left above water at a given amount of sea level rise. It's not a complete answer to your question but you can use it to run animations with different ranges of added water depending on how crazy you want to get with your sci-fi scenario.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Went to “see North America” and they cut out Canada. Ouch!

[–] Didz@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Watch the movie Waterworld (1995).

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, so it would result in more Kevin Costner.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And webbed toes.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I think you meant to say "documentary"

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've seen this film several times and can confirm it's a realistic depiction of what it would be like.

[–] narnach@feddit.nl 14 points 1 year ago

If it’s a small amount, I don’t think it will matter much.

If it’s a huge amount, it will become part of the water cycle systems. Oceans/seas/lakes evaporate surface water, which become clouds, which move around, then hit mountains and other things, get squeezed, release rain, which generally flows back to oceans via rivers. It may get stuck in lakes, or as snow on mountains, but in the big picture that is temporary.

Adding more water will likely put more in the oceans, as that is what holds most water right now.

Based on what I read about melting icebergs, If you add enough sweet water to oceans, it might mess with how water flows between oceans, which upsets how air flows across the planet, and thus it messes with large scale weather patterns. For example, Europe benefits massively from patterns that feed it warmer air.

Imagine Europe getting the same low amount of rain as the Sahara, or the Sahara suddenly getting the rain Europe gets right now. It’ll be a catastrophe if that persists for decades or longer.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I would definitely buy a welly boot company

[–] Tetra@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

For starters even if we could do that, I doubt the water would go to places that actually need it. Heck it's not like we don't have enough on Earth already, we already very much COULD supply poor African countries with the water and food they need, we just don't.

If we could drag resources from outer space, only the countries that are already rich would benefit.

It would get wet

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How much are we talking here? If it's a shitfuckton I'm pretty sure it would get warmer as ice and land mass would get covered by less reflective water and more water vapor would accumulate in the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas. Also Kevin Costner would be out there doing his shenanigans trying to find some land so we just generally want to avoid this whole scenario because the man is too old for this shit at this point.

[–] rynzcycle@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

What if we brought it in as ice? Thus solving the problem once and for all. ONCE AND FOR ALL!

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You ever see the movie water world?

[–] counselwolf@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Let me preface that I don't know much about any of these stuff.

I imagined a giant pitcher of water slowly filling up the earth.

A flooded earth sounds interesting, are there other planets out there that are overflowing with water?

If there are, that might be what would happen.

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europa_(moon) , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganymede_(moon) .

Within our solar system, these two moons carry a lot of water. Both very cool planetary objects, but not one of them is overflowing like in your imagined planet. We can't really study planets outside of our own neighborhood in high (enough?) detail yet, so this is it for now :P

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Overflowing in what sense?

Enough water to overcome the surface tension that keeps it from spilling off the edge of the plane^t^.

Ain't no planet X comin' since ain't no space 'cause ain't not globe earth.

[–] starman@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Kamino planet sure has a lot of water

[–] GolGolarion@pathfinder.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Extrapolating a bit, what if we brought in enough water to cover the entire current exosphere? Or if you added enough water that the planet engulfed the moon? How would the water behave at those extreme pressures? What would happen to the landmasses beneath it?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 year ago

Water world...

[–] darkentries@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Boats boats boats

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Probably be a lot of water yo.

load more comments
view more: next ›