this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
706 points (99.2% liked)

News

23268 readers
2854 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 174 points 11 months ago (18 children)

Reminder that the both the Mormon & Catholic "Churches" could feed, house & clothe every single homeless person in the USA indefinitely & it would only cost them a fraction of their net worth.

They had rather sit on their wealth like the Dragon though, regardless of the punishments for that described in their "Bible".

That's how you know they don't really believe in their own bullshit.

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 57 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Churches need to pay taxes. It's unacceptable that they're the only ones who are officially exempt.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

They aren't the only ones, though. The rich find more than enough write-offs.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Libertarians are always certain religious charities will foot all of the bills though.

Like if humans were perfect and weren’t greedy assholes.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 111 points 11 months ago (22 children)

proof again that the government could severely curtail homelessness if they wanted to-- they just don't.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago (17 children)

Something something bootstraps.

[–] TheCrispyDud@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

That's it I'm cutting any and all bootstraps I see. Menacingly approaches old riding boots

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago (6 children)

We can invent billions of dollars to give away during the pandemic, and billions more to give Israel to continue its genocide against Palestinians, but solving student debt or homelessness or universal health care? We don't have enough money for that!

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 22 points 11 months ago

Because interest payments make profit, and reducing people’s ability to not live paycheck to paycheck increases the workers dependency on the system.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

universal health care? We don’t have enough money for that!

Universal healthcare would, ironically, save the government, businesses, and consumers money all at the same time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] spectradawn77@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Proof that the military needs more money, you say? That’s correct!! 😅

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How else are they going to keep all those homeless people in check

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (5 children)

No Democrats or Republicans actually get voted out for voting for shitty things, so where's the motivation?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Nurgle@lemmy.world 72 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

44% of single family homes were purchased by private equity in 2023. Some analysts expect institutional investors to control 40% of the SFH rental market by 2030.

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

And when are the American people going to demand an end to this shit? They represented less than 3% of sfh ownership in 2012. How long until everyone must rent? How long until people are forced to sell due to taxes driving them out of ownership due to inflated pricing from these ghouls?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 68 points 11 months ago

It's okay guys. The government is (checks notes) giving money to your land lords with no strings attached.

I'll be at the bar if anyone wants to join me.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wait people were getting aid? I thought we all got a couple thousand dollars and thoughts and prayers... That shit dried up in one month.

[–] doricub@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (26 children)

My best guess is the ending of eviction moratoriums related to covid.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Something needs to be done. Housing is a nightmare.

[–] EmoBean@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (6 children)

But unemployment is at the lowest ever! We added 200.000 jobs. There was only a soft recession. Line goes up, and just in time for something important. What a coincidence. The economy is so great and we're back in the bull market!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Few seem to care…including those who will one day be there themselves.

[–] Kiernian@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Few seem to care…including those who will one day be there themselves.

What are those of us who care supposed to be doing?

Amidst deciding which bills get paid each paycheck, trying to find nutritional variety out of food banks (canned fish intake should ideally be less than 10 cans a month per person, for example, and even rinsing canned vegetables/beans isn't doing wonders for sodium intake compared to fresh), trying to decide which medical and dental issues we can afford to address and which just get to be endured, and watching debt go to collections because food, insurance, automobile fuel, home energy, rent, and everything related to cars has gone up, what are we supposed to be doing?

In what way can we unite as a people and fix this?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Rents soar as government continues heavy suppression of new housing construction.

[–] cryostars@lemmyf.uk 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I keep seeing this argument. I see a metric funckton of new construction and they are ALL 400k+ which is a lot for our smaller/mid city. Existing inventory is averaging the same.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes some construction happens. It’s still profitable in some cases, especially when the target market is the richest segments of society.

But there could be so much more. They could build two houses on each of those plots of land, and maybe each house is only $250k but you’ve managed to get $500k of real estate out of the same plot of land which (as any good capitalist will tell you) is better than $400k of real estate.

But you can’t do that. Density restrictions. Zoning laws that are way too narrowly defined, ie bloated, and have long since surpassed the “Don’t boil horse carcasses next to a daycare” sort of scenario by which zoning laws are explained in our history books.

Instead of just protecting public health zoning’s now also protecting people’s views, protecting people’s lawns, protecting people’s resale value on their homes.

Like, oh your view of Mt Shasta got blocked by an apartment building? Gee that sucks but it also doesn’t suck that five hundred new apartments are on the market now, weakening the monopoly some local cartel has on pricing and slowing the rise of rent prices.

We have a sort of overton window in terms of how much construction is “a little” and how much is “a fuckton”. Living our lives in this kind of supply crackdown has calibrated our sense of how much construction is a fuckton.

Just imagine that construction you’re seeing … but twice as tall. Perfectly conceivable, even financially favorable to the people who would make it happen, but literally not allowed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They just to apply themselves, get out there and hustle, bring value, and make others rich! /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›