this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
587 points (95.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35451 readers
724 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This seems incompatible with a pretty high proportion of Americans.

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Y'all getting kinda thicc too, no offense.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

It's funny because you don't know which country he's from but it still applies anyway because everyone is getting fatter

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Relevant username

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Naja_kaouthia@sh.itjust.works 92 points 1 year ago (4 children)

With your face right at prime fart receiving level. Wtf.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even for the people who would get off on that, their joy would turn to frustration when the flight attendant asked them to stop masturbating.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

The Pink Eye Express.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Pretty soon they're just going to roofie people and pack them into planes like sardines.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 year ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 61 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't absolutely hate it, but I'm 6'3", so fully stretching my legs out on a plane is always just a pipe dream.

I'm sure they'd make them fit only average size people, unfortunately.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think they should just have rows of bunk beds. It's much easier to stack something flat than people with their awkward bends at the hips and knees.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 1 year ago

unsurprisingly the ship and train industry figured this shit out like literally a century ago

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The airlines can maximize that idea as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks_(1781_ship)#/media/File:Slaveshipposter.jpg

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superfes@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Window seat dude needs to take a piss, watch the fun ...

Also, why the fuck is she smiling?!

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think these only go down the center based on the photo.

She's smiling because she's being paid to smile.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

One day they'll invent super-economy class where you just get strapped to the wings and released over your destination. Parachutes will cost extra.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PoetSII@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think whoever thought of this concept should die

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xenon@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (5 children)

imagine this plane crashing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] janus2@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

at that point just give me general anaesthesia and put me in an airline shipping coffin so at least i don't have to be conscious for the horror show

Someone somewhere just pulled out some graph paper and is sketching a concept.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kase@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (12 children)

As someone who doesn't have claustrophobia, I feel claustrophobic just looking at this. Then again, I've never been on a plane before, and for all I know this might be better :/

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That doesn't actually look to bad considering what we have today

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right at fart smelling level

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smytty@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's smiling, so you know it's all okay

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kamen@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why does she look so happy?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Paid model or executive. They're trying to sell the concept.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zink@pawb.social 26 points 1 year ago

These people smile like they've never rode in an airplane with more than 3 people

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"why do people prefer trains??"

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly I wish that was the case in the US.

For most people, trains are not a alternative.

Often trains cost more. Many train stations are messes and share space with busses.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I desperately want to take a train anywhere. BUT

A) It always costs at least as much as a plane but often much much more

B) it's slower than driving!

C) the stops are so limited you basically have to follow major coastal cities or you're SOL

Literally if any of these three things were changed I would take weekend trips all the time

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (21 children)

No, wait. This is actually not a bad idea.

Look closely. First of all there's a rigid barrier between the lower and upper seat. That means that fart gasses won't get through, unlike current seats where farts just spread everywhere around a person, so only the upper seats will be affected.

Second, the lady has her feet up, meaning she has enough leg room to do so. This is a big advantage because you can kick your feet up on your underseat baggage while you sleep or stretch your legs. It's much better than the current layout where you can barely move at all.

No offense, but I think anyone with a negative opinion of this layout is wrong.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DancingIsForbidden@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Seems happy to be probably smelling some bodies vacation diet farts for an entire international flight. Imagine the farts you'll be subjected to sitting under somebody who spent a week in Indonesia or Thailand absorbing the spicy local cuisine.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Treczoks@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

There are laws regulating how to transport pigs and cows to the slaughterhouse. They have more space than the passengers on this plane.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago
[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can they guarantee it won't collapse and break my legs?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ydieb@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (5 children)

As a taller person, if this gives me sufficient legroom and a seat that actually distributes the weight over my whole thighs such that I can sit somewhat comfortable, this seems like a major upgrade to me.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

The sadness really hits when you see this was last year, and not 1991 where the concept should have stayed.

[–] AceQuorthon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 year ago

Transatlantic human cattle

load more comments
view more: next ›