this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
223 points (93.7% liked)

News

22896 readers
4980 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] insomniac@sh.itjust.works 82 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is incredibly obvious but it’s stated this way because a more honest headline would be uninteresting. The last time there was a serious Republican primary was 2015.

So they’re saying debate ratings are lower than the last time there wasn’t an obvious front runner. Yeah, no shit cnbc. Good job.

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago

Yeah, the better question is - whose actually watching? Trump is obviously going to be the nominee unless he's literally forced off the ballot, and if that happens it's just going to be chaos because I guarentee he's just going to continue running as a write in candidate

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 44 points 11 months ago

whats to watch. a bunch of un-empathetic sycophants pretending to have a platform or relevance to an audience already "not votin for a lib"

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It's Republicans debating against each other? Like aren't they all the same?

[–] ChaoticEntropy 46 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"I'm a piece of shit."

"No I'm a piece of shit!"

"Heh... that's cute. I'm the biggest piece of shit."

rapturous applause

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Narrator: The audience was the biggest piece of shit, after all...

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Holy shit some of those are comedy gold! These assholes are on the same team which makes it even more funny!

[–] June@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I only got the Chris Christie clip. Are there supposed to be more?

[–] coffeeaddict@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

That is kind of a good point tho? Why are we ridiculing this person/debate (I'm not familiar all) based on this video?

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

They're all racist, misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic, and antisemitic, just in different orders.

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't watch it without a cable subscription or signing up for a streaming service. That's probably at least part of it.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There was a second Republican primary debate?

[–] Random_user@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

FR, first I've heard of it.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they have nothing interesting to say, no policies to discuss, and are a black hole of charisma.

[–] RaineV1@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

That last part is all that really matters in this case. None of them can make their insanity interesting to watch without the reality TV star around.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

But didn't they watch in the hopes that Vivek would spit out some rhymes? Vivek rhymes with cake, you know.

[–] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

[...] lowest viewership since 2015

Hasn't there only been one other debate since then...? That's rather misleading.

[–] RaineV1@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Probably looking at all republican debates since 2015. In short, the lowest its been since Trump.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Who wants to watch a bunch of mentally ill psychopaths talk over each other? I sure don’t.

[–] jmd_akbar@aussie.zone 0 points 11 months ago

To the most of the world, they are "mentally ill psychopaths", but to their rabid supporters, they can do no wrong. They will still watch them, cheer them on, and support them and vote for them...

[–] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why would you want to watch? They're all a bunch of losers and one worse than the next. They're the current failures that rose to the top.

None have compelling arguments or solutions and are only there to shitsling each other. Even monkeys at the zoo are smarter.

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So in other words, lower than the ones in 2019?

[–] nocturne213@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Was there a repugnican debate in 2019?

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

You're right, there wasn't. I didn't read the article at first since I thought the title was clickbait, but it seems like they're actually saying the ratings were lower than any debate in 2015 or later. They just phrased it in a confusing way.

[–] Stopkilling0@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago

What a surprise? Why would anyone watch when the front runner isint even going to be there.