this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
86 points (96.7% liked)

UK Politics

3205 readers
463 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

LONDON (AP) — The BBC has apologized to staff members who felt unable to complain about the conduct of actor and comedian Russell Brand because of his status after an internal review found that concerns about his behavior weren’t handled appropriately.

The investigation by Peter Johnston, the BBC’s director of editorial complaints, identified eight complaints about Brand, including allegations that he had sex on BBC premises and exposed himself in the studio. Only one of those complaints was formally made to management at the time, Johnston found.

“I am grateful to those who have come forward to talk to me and my team and I have apologized on behalf of the BBC to those most directly affected by what I have documented here,’’ Johnston said in a report released Thursday. “The culture of the time undoubtedly influenced what was acceptable/tolerated, but I have found that a number of individuals had concerns about Russell Brand’s behavior which they felt unable to raise then.’’

The BBC launched its investigation after British media published claims by four women that they were sexually assaulted by Brand between 2006 and 2013, at the height of his fame. Brand had two weekly radio shows on the BBC from 2006 to 2008 and worked periodically on a number of short-term projects.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

How were they supposed to know he was a wrong'un? Nobody had any idea at the time.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 9 points 7 hours ago

Turns out becoming a conspiracy grifter wasn't even the worst thing Brand has done. Dickhead.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Does he still count as a comedian? He isn't really funny

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 5 hours ago

If you ramble on and slur your words, but don’t stink of bodily fluids, people assume you are a comedian rather than a street wino or sex offender on early release.

[–] Emperor 5 points 7 hours ago

He was never really funny.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago

"We are so sorry, but don't let it happen again or you are so fired."

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

How about when their staff wanted to speak out against genocide? Has the BBC apologized for those muzzlings yet?

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 34 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The BBC has a pretty bad history with employing sex offenders who go on for years without being discovered, enough that the situation has it's own Wikipedia page. Jimmy Saville, Rolf Harris, Huw Edwards, Russell Brand and Noel Clarke all come to mind off the top of my head but I'm sure there are many other cases too.

[–] tinned_tomatoes 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Do you think there's also an element of the BBC being held to a much higher standard than other organisations, given that it's publicly funded?

How many pesos in ITV do we just not hear about?

[–] Aggravationstation 12 points 13 hours ago
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 6 points 12 hours ago

I would dread a headline about "apologizing" ever be printed about me. There's nothing less genuine feeling.

[–] shath@hexbear.net 3 points 14 hours ago