this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

And Finally...

1197 readers
71 users here now

A place for odd or quirky world news stories.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse:

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The lure of remote-controlled intimacy gadgets isn’t hard to understand. Whether you’re in a long-distance relationship or just like the convenience, these devices have taken the market by storm.

According to a 2023 study commissioned by the U.K.’s Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology (DSIT), these toys are some of the most vulnerable consumer IoT products.

And while a vibrating smart egg or a remotely controlled chastity belt might sound futuristic, the risks involved are decidedly dystopian.

Forbes’ Davey Winder flagged the issue four years ago when hackers locked users into a chastity device, demanding a ransom to unlock it.

Fast forward to now, and the warnings are louder than ever. Researchers led by Dr. Mark Cote found multiple vulnerabilities in these devices, primarily those relying on Bluetooth connectivity.

Alarmingly, many of these connections lack encryption, leaving the door wide open for malicious third parties.

...

A TechCrunch exposé revealed that a security researcher breached a chastity device’s database containing over 10,000 users’ information. That was back in June, and the manufacturer still hasn’t addressed the issue.

In another incident, users of the CellMate connected chastity belt reported hackers demanding $750 in bitcoin to unlock devices. Fortunately, one man who spoke to Vice hadn’t been wearing his when the attack happened. Small mercies, right?

...

And let’s not forget: IoT toys are multiplying faster than anyone can track, with websites like Internet of Dongs monitoring the surge.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Emperor 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Alarmingly, many of these connections lack encryption, leaving the door wide open for malicious third parties.

I, for one, wouldn't want to leave my vulnerable back door open to willy-nilly attack.

[–] Zip2 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You wouldn’t want t to be caught with your trousers down. Rest assured, a crack team are looking into it.

[–] Emperor 5 points 3 days ago

It's dirty work, but with the current economic tailwinds, even a bum job is not to be sniffed at.

[–] Hossenfeffer 4 points 3 days ago

Internet of Dongs

What a time to be alive!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Emperor 1 points 2 days ago

To be fair, I've done that to myself with a diet if Jerusalem artichokes and crap pop.

[–] Vibi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 days ago

Absolutely giggling that there's an organization for this, but I'm happy to see it. I'm not unfamiliar with these devices, and it's always in the back of my mind that the makers probably aren't prioritizing security and potential vulnerabilities. Literally, everything these days wants you to use an app or connect to your network 🙄

[–] Zip2 14 points 4 days ago

Sounds like someone’s mainframe is getting penetrated.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 16 points 4 days ago

not everything needs to be a computer

[–] Hossenfeffer 3 points 3 days ago

"The wife fancied a bit of bondage the other night. 'Tie me up and do anything you want,' she whispered alluringly. So I tied her, spread-eagled to the bed, and then turned the telly over to Match of the Day."

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I see how it could be a problem with a chastity device, but for most bog standard vibrators I fail to see any potential harm. Like, if I've got my rabbit vibe connected to my phone it's gonna be with the express intent of having it vibrate, innit? The worst thing a hacker could do is just make my Nora stop while I'm jilling off with it.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 3 days ago

I fail to see how any chastity device could be strong enough to be a real problem. I mean, what if the batteries die? There's surely a manual release

Plus, what is it made of? You can just rip apart most electronic locks

The bigger issue is the personal data

[–] OrlandoDoom 3 points 3 days ago

"Jilling off" I'm dead

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 7 points 3 days ago

"chastity device’s database containing over 10,000 users’ information."

That's at lot. I would have thought not much more than a thousand but holy cack. There's a lot of pent up frustration there.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 8 points 4 days ago

IoT...

Shittest possible way of doing anything.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Amazing how our dear government is never worried about pedons' cell phones hmmm

[–] mannycalavera 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

AmaIng how our dea government is never worried about pedons' cell phones hmmm

🧐

What the fuck have I just read?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Emperor 2 points 3 days ago

!aneurysmposting@sopuli.xyz