this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
159 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39127 readers
3138 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Andrius Kubilius, the EU’s nominee for Defense Commissioner, emphasized the need for increased European defense spending in response to Russian threats, rather than demands from U.S. President-elect Donald Trump.

At his confirmation hearing, Kubilius noted that Europe has boosted defense budgets since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

He stressed that intelligence suggests Russia could test EU or NATO resolve by the end of the decade, making enhanced military readiness essential for deterrence.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

As much as I hate to hear about war spending increasing planet-wide, it's definitely dawning on our allies that depending on the US for protection and support is no longer a tenable position. It might turn out to be a good thing that more countries develop a modern military apparatus, though, particularly as there are several Putin-type heads of state in the world.

[–] wewbull 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly. No country should have the military spending that the US does. It's too much power in one place. I understand the cold war made it necessary though.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The military spending in the US is all about wealth transfer. The rich make money off military spending (tax dollars) AND the boondoggles our military is engaged in (usually in the interests of the elites).

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

particularly as there are several Putin-type heads of state in the world

One has even been recently elected, just not as cunning and rather more stupid.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

More nuclear warheads as well. Not saying that's a good thing, but it seems to be the only real deterrent.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Came here to say the exact same thing.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, our Kurdish allies learned the hard way not to depend on US support during Trump's first term, and honestly, I'd love it if he pulls our country out of more wars, even if he does it for the wrong reasons. I've never supported the US being the policemen of the world.

[–] wewbull 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The US isn't in anything right now. It's deployed (it always is), but not in active hostilities.

(Unless I'm missing something in Central or South America)

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 2 points 2 weeks ago

The US military is currently directly involved in fighting in Yemen and Somalia. It's relatively small-scale, but it is happening

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, that we know of.

Clinton was fairly brilliant in branding his wars as 'peacekeeping actions' and Obama rebranded civilians as 'enemy combatants', so while yes it may be unofficial, we're still essentially at war everywhere.

[–] wewbull 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So how will you know if he changes anything?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's a good question, I think.

I know most people don't, but I consume a few foreign news sources myself. It helps to lend a broader perspective on US governance, and with the US press running cover for fascists, it's an increasingly valuable way to learn more about US events.