Stay strong brother. There's dozens of us.
wewbull
For instance, the rule talks about hardware and software technologies. Cars using VCS (vehicle connectivity systems) and ADS (automated driving systems) software and hardware manufactured in China or Russia will soon be banned.
There's nothing specific to EVs in what is reported in this article. An F150 can also be in breach of it uses a Chinese Bluetooth chip (for example).
Making a statement about Oct 7th doesn't make a negative statement about the rest of the war. Neither is omitting to say something a statement.
You're inferring what you're assuming his position is and it helps noone.
People are so amped up that's it's impossible to discuss certain topics with being willfully misunderstood. All to assign people a side in the conflict.
🎉🎈🎊🎇
0.1%
Crisis averted.
Well you see... Despite what people say, the reasons behind these rules has very little to do with children. So they don't actually care if it solves the "problem".
Doesn't mean they should be arrested and put on trial.
This is where I think there will be a need for laser based weaponry. Tracking a moving target isn't hard. Predicting it's position when the bullet / missile arrives is the hard bit. So lasers don't really miss. Cost per shot is low so intercepting cheap drones is not an issue.
Biggest problem is mobility, but I think I've read articles about a version dragged around behind a Land Rover.
I find a Labrador more effective.
A federated system of discussion groups. That's such a 90s idea.
I suspect a number could do with a steam clean given the fat residue that goes the same route.
"Wales" is... kinda.