this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
176 points (98.4% liked)

Movies & TV

22861 readers
40 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FortifiedAttack@hexbear.net 53 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They didn't care because being a Star Trek fan meant being a weird, fat loser nerd 20 years ago.

Now the wine-clinking neoliberals are pretending to always have thought it a progressive masterpiece, when in reality, they thought it was entertainment for freaks.

[–] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 39 points 2 months ago

The premise is literally fully automated luxury gay space communism... Like, Roddenberry was def on a watch list. And from what I understand the studio had to tamp down a lot of what he wanted to do.

[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 36 points 2 months ago
[–] newmou@hexbear.net 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I read this and I was like damn what’s a Black Flag Officer that sounds awesome

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago (4 children)

"Representation matters" - does it tho? Putting oppressed minorities in media while oppressing them is tokenism

[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

a bunch of people were inspired to do a bunch of things because of star trek, and you're profoundly ignorant if you think the inclusion of minoritized or demonized people in the optimistic future of original series and tng era was irrelevant.

hell, Dr. King personally asked Nichelle Nichols not to quit the show. Trek did it (mostly) right, don't lump it in with a tom clancy movie's black president.

[–] tmyakal@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Whoopi Goldberg has that anecdote she loves to tell of being a little girl, seeing Nichelle Nichols on TV, and Whoopi starts running around the house, screaming, "Mommy! Mommy! There's a black lady on TV and she's not a maid!"

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 21 points 2 months ago

I don't think celebrating diversity genuinely is tokenism personally. If you have a respectable character being cool who is some underrepresented minority, it can be inspiring.

If you are doing things like rainbow military recruitment or you are Fox hosting specifically transphobic trans women or extreme rightwing black people to try to pretend you don't have a problem with racism or transphobia or a company just trying to meet some quotas to avoid being sued, then it would be tokenism imo.

Anyways, I do personally think representation is important. Moreso in real life, but media is a place people look to for similar inspiration. Sometimes little things can mean a lot for some people.

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes, of course it does???

Putting minorities in media and showing them as respectable equals is not tokenism, and is doubly important to do when real life doesn't reflect that. Rodenberry did not have the power to fucking solve racial oppression, he incorporated all nationalities to showcase the importance and futurism of not being a racist fuck.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think that's why I always enjoy The Ultimate Computer when it pops up in TOS rewatches. Dr. Daystrom is treated as just another person, brilliant and flawed alike.

I think Trek did, and still does, have a sexism problem though. Even "should have known better" TNG writers did. Guess which two main cast members had sword training but were demoted to breaking pots over guards' heads in Qpid?

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that is cool. And I'm definitely not arguing Trek was perfect, just that it did good things in that regard.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also allowing some of the oppressed become oppressors too is not really meaningful progress.

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

like in this example

[–] Tripbin@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Off topic a bit but are there any openly leftist trek actors? I know a lot support dems but is Janeway riding with AOC the furthest they go?

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Quark is more than a hero, he's a union man.

Stewart is a squishy lib socialist

Nimoy was investigated by HUAAC for support of McGovern.

Colm Meany believes strongly that 26+6=1

[–] egonallanon@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You're thinking of Rom not Quark, Quark remained capitalist to the end.

[–] Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

Armin Shimerman (the guy who played Quark) was an official in SAG-AFTRA

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

I mean the actor, Armin Shimermann

[–] Crowtee_Robot@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago

Wallace Shawn played Grand Nagus Zek on DS9 and he's literally a socialist, but beyond that the best you can hope for with Trek actors these days is having good takes about Palestine. Some do, but most don't.