someone

joined 10 months ago
[–] someone@hexbear.net 3 points 3 hours ago

Every time I watch "Sins of the Father" and see Kurn alone in that underground tunnel surrounded by murderous enemies but still declaring "He is my brother! I will not betray him!" I tear up a bit. "What you are in the dark" both figuratively and literally. It probably hits me harder as I am an eldest brother myself.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 12 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Hezbollah propaganda directed at Israelis regarding how little progress has been made in this offensive

Has Blackadder ever been dubbed into Hebrew? It would be funny for Hezbollah to taunt the Israeli government with the map scene.

(Also, ignore the comments.)

[–] someone@hexbear.net 44 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

And the DNC is perfectly happy with the outcome, because capital remains unthreatened.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 2 points 11 hours ago

I think they're wary of his base. Not all of his base are the "adventure" type of course. But I think enough of them are that any traditional-Republican politician's thoughts of removing him from power are going to run into the figurative cold shower of "what if his fans find out I'm behind it?"

[–] someone@hexbear.net 3 points 22 hours ago

CAN. FUCKING. CONFIRM.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago

And in that case... Dems might actually feel like they have to do a real campaign, rather than just bang the "orange fascist" gong a bunch more.

I'd actually bet on them continuing as the paid puppets of Wall Street, quietly propping up multiple Trump successors to split the base, and hoping that it's enough to put them in power without either the popular vote or having to abandon their wealthy donors.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

They are going to learn absolutely nothing.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

Make Software Spaghetti Again!

Got you covered.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're looking to write the types of server daemons often written in C, Go is another good choice. It's very C-like in its syntax. It has a lot of the same safety features Rust has but isn't nearly as complex to learn. It also has a huge standard library, so you rarely need to rely on third-party code.

Go isn't too suitable for drivers or kernels or other kinds of system software though. Rust is definitely a better choice for those.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it's going to come down to whether establishment republicans are better able to keep a leash on him after 4 years of gaining experience on how to do so, or if he's going to be even more unhinged and unhandleable now that he doesn't have to give a shit about winning another election and his ego is riding higher than ever. I have no idea which way it'll go.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The N1's problems went beyond the inadequate guidance system unfortunately. The NK-33 engines (all those engines on the bottom of the first stage) had pyrotechnic initiated fuel valves instead of the more standard hydraulic ones, which in plain english means that each engine could only ever be ignited once without being completely rebuilt. They had no way of testing the completed individual engines that went on the N1 first stage. They could only do random testing of engines from the same batch and hope that the rest of the engines of that batch also performed up to par as the sacrificial test engine. It turned out that they frequently didn't, leading to explosions and engine-bay fires.

Starship's engines are designed specifically for extreme re-usability, so SpaceX simply tests every single engine that comes off their assembly lines. In fact one of the engines off the recently-caught Super Heavy booster was put on a test stand after its flight to see how it performed after reentry and landing. It did 34 ignition/shutdown cycles in just a few minutes without any explosions happening. That's an extremely punishing test for a rocket engine. One of the big advantages of re-using rockets is that it makes it really easy to test flown hardware to see if it's performing as designed, and if not, correct any design or production flaws.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But what if I'm attending an accounting convention?

 

tl;dr: One of the most critical steps in development of a rapidly and completely reusable rocket just worked perfectly on its first test in the real world: midair catching of the biggest booster rocket ever back at its launch tower.

Okay, I'll start with the usual caveat that all my respect for what is happening within SpaceX is solely for the engineers and technicians and scientists doing the actual work and not for the know-nothing shithead who owns most of it. And that my excitement for the problem is solely for the scientific breakthroughs that can come from having a cheap and reusable super-heavy-lift rocket available.

The link is for a reputable spaceflight youtube channel doing commentary on the launch, as SpaceX is now required by the shithead-in-chief to only stream video on twitter/x. If you'd like a palate cleanser, the same channel presenter did a highly complimentary 94-minute in-depth documentary about the history of Soviet rocket engines. And he loves Soyuz.

The background: Starship/Super Heavy is the first attempt ever to build a rapidly and completely reusable launch system. It comes in two components: Super Heavy, the 10-metre-wide, 70-metre-tall, 33-engine booster. And Starship, the 10-metre-wide 50-metre-tall 6-engine ship that rides on top of it.

The booster and launch tower are designed for rapid turnaround, like a jetliner at an airport. Launch, return, do a systems check, refuel, and launch again within a few hours. To make this work they have to minimize the time spent moving a landed booster from its landing site to the launch tower. So why not just have the launch tower catch the returning booster mid-air? That saves all the time and equipment needed to set up the booster again. Insane, right? But this morning they proved that it works. It worked on their first try ever. This is one of the massive early R&D wins that can take years off a development schedule. Now that they know this method definitely works with this tower design, they can build more launch towers of the same design and rapidly accelerate more launch tests.

And the Starship on top also did its job. It flew most of the way around the world, testing re-entry systems before doing a soft intact splashdown in the Indian Ocean. Until it exploded afterwards, but hey, it's a prototype!

It's hard to overstate what all this can mean for space science down the road. First, a Starship variant is NASA's official lunar landing vehicle for the Artemis program. Or we could launch mass quantities of mass-produced probes and landers everywhere really cheaply, instead of one-offs every few years and having to have academic fights over where to send them and what instruments to include. We could put huge radio telescopes on the far side of the Moon where Earth's radio noise is completely blocked. We could put extrasolar-asteroid interceptors in orbit, ready to chase the ultrafast visiting interstellar rocks with massive fuel drop tanks. There's all sorts of science possibilities that open up when the cost of launch a hundred tonnes to low Earth orbit goes from several billion dollars to just several million.

(Again, see caveat at the top. I'm just in it for the science.)

 

One country that he doesn't mention?

Ukraine.

One country that he does mention?

Palestine.

 

There's more than one definition of "engineer".

 

For those who don't know, Larry Ellison runs the tech company Oracle, and is consistently in the list of top-five wealthiest people in the world.

 

They were even throbbing from root to tip, so to speak.

This is day #2 of this game for me. I am eager to find more weirdness in the stars.

 

The company has updated its FAQ page to say that private chats are no longer shielded from moderation.

Telegram has quietly removed language from its FAQ page that said private chats were protected from moderation requests. The change comes nearly two weeks after its CEO, Pavel Durov, was arrested in France for allegedly allowing “criminal activity to go on undeterred on the messaging app.”

Earlier today, Durov issued his first public statement since his arrest, promising to moderate content more on the platform, a noticeable change in tone after the company initially said he had “nothing to hide.”

“Telegram’s abrupt increase in user count to 950M caused growing pains that made it easier for criminals to abuse our platform,” he wrote in the statement shared on Thursday. “That’s why I made it my personal goal to ensure we significantly improve things in this regard. We’ve already started that process internally, and I will share more details on our progress with you very soon.”

Translation: Durov is completely compromised and will do whatever NATO tells him to do. Do not trust in the security of Telegram, which frankly was never that good to begin with. And do not trust anything else even remotely connected to the company or Durov personally.

 

Lower-income American households are running out of money at the end of every month, the discount retailer Dollar General said as it released dismal results that drove its shares down more than 30 per cent for their sharpest one-day drop on record.

When the American economy is too rough for Dollar General...

 

What happens to Doom when pi isn't 3.14159etc?

 

This is the lesser-known companion Playstation game to the classic anime Serial Experiments Lain. There's a downloadable version as well. The bottom of this page has the chart of keyboard controls.

Also, the gameplay is highly unconventional. It's not like a regular visual novel. It has a totally different style and purpose and interface than Disco Elysium, but it takes the same sort of patience and open mindedness.

 

The two astronauts will remain on the ISS until February 2025, when they'll return with two astronauts on the SpaceX Crew-9 mission that's arriving at the ISS next month.

 

Not only did some 1960s engineers at General Electric think that this might work, but they did actual tests involving actual hardware. NASA and the USAF declined to pursue the project, for fairly obvious reasons.

 

Original story title: "Gemini is replacing Google Assistant on Pixel phones, and it’s a train wreck"

view more: next ›