this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
260 points (97.8% liked)

chapotraphouse

13447 readers
909 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RoabeArt@hexbear.net 88 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Criticizing the current administration in charge of the country that supplies arms to a country committing genocide == pro-Trump.

Nobody is talking about Trump BECAUASE HE'S NOT RUNNING THE USA RIGHT NOW. I don't know how it's so hard for libs to understand thus.

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 45 points 2 weeks ago

But but but but he COULD BE berdly-smug

[–] Bay_of_Piggies@hexbear.net 43 points 2 weeks ago

It's so American centric. As thought there aren't other people who have nothing to do with this stupid dog and pony show every 4 years.

[–] AndJusticeForAll@hexbear.net 34 points 2 weeks ago

The eternal election.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

So is what is the point of being critical of the party that is pro human suffering.

Like they use it as a positive for their party, being critical of it won't change the minds of those who think Trump is a good/viable candidate

[–] REgon@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's kinda funny how liberals would dunk on MAGA types between 2016-2020 when they would say "but her emails" and the libs would say "she's not president!" but somehow they've memoryholed that line of reasoning

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 73 points 2 weeks ago

Talking down to victims of genocide for not supporting the candidate actively pursuing genocide hard enough is utterly disgusting behavior.

Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds. visible-disgust

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 64 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Posting from my wine cave how a Palestinian literally dodging bombs needs to do better and support Madam President...who's dropping said bombs on him.

[–] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago

But have you considered that wet man will drop 1.35% more bombs? :smuglord:

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 59 points 2 weeks ago

this sparked genuine nausea

[–] Cammy@hexbear.net 52 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How do you become so detached from humanity that you go into reddit tier clapbacks when met with a genocide survivor?

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 37 points 2 weeks ago

Imperial mindset.

[–] sweatersocialist@hexbear.net 52 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i just looked at bros twitter. he has 50 followers and pays for a checkmark. ROFL

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 28 points 2 weeks ago

complains about Trump but gives money to the guy who donates to Trump's campaign so he has clout with 50 other cybertruck owners

Curious. Very curious. Really activates the almonds.

[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 50 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This person needs to be strapped to a chair and forced to watch Shabat's videos for three days straight.

[–] OptimusSubprime@hexbear.net 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

strapped to a chair and forced to watch Shabat's videos

The liberals should all be Ludovico'd. The second they think of a nuclear take such as the above, they will instantly become sick. And the more the libs think of such takes, they sicker they'll get until they throw themselves out of a window or off of a cliff or high rise.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's either that or the wall.

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

This first, then the wall if it doesn't work

[–] kittin@hexbear.net 35 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm interesting you didn’t say Trump should also be forced to watch Shabat for three days

[–] Angel@hexbear.net 49 points 2 weeks ago

stalin-point this one right here

[–] GnastyGnuts@hexbear.net 46 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

When liberals pull a "what about Trump?" accuse them of "whataboutism." Will it accomplish anything? No, but it will be funny and annoying.

Whataboutism? What about deez nuts?

[–] Afterthought_C@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm thinking call them Squealer and ask them how much milk and apples they were paid to spread their propaganda.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

this "person" cares more about a spelling incident from the late 1980s than children dying right now

[–] sweatersocialist@hexbear.net 46 points 2 weeks ago

noticing 🤓

yeah enjoy your brat summer, cracker

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 45 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's a bot. has to be. right?

if that's not a bot... jesus sadness-abysmal

Edit: I don't think it's a bot. This person deserves the fucking pit.

[–] beef_curds@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My money's still on them being some paid sock, if they're not a bot. Between their extremely generic follows and only being a 2 month old account, it seems fishy.

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

yeah. I guess i thought a paid DNC shill would be less bald-facedly morally repugnant, but this is the party trying to outflank trump from the right on immigration and joyously funding a genocide rn so

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

its surprising how fast they turn to fascist rhetoric to justify genocide whenever you mention people are allowed not to vote for democrats

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Fascism in my liberalism? No way shocked-pikachu

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 40 points 2 weeks ago
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 40 points 2 weeks ago
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 37 points 2 weeks ago

interesting... noticing... smuglord very-intelligent

[–] Posadas@hexbear.net 37 points 2 weeks ago
[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Is "what about trump" their "but her emails"? You expect someone who is dodging bombs to happily join the coconut guild smiley clown that cosigns the bombing and backs the starvation going on? You absolute wanker people dying. This isn't a fucking game for reddit updoots for fuck sakes

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 22 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know if they just don't conceptualize the genocide as a real event happening in the real world, or they're scolding the victims because being alive is inconvenient to their political program.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is why i'm thinking we need a name for what Democrats are right now, as a political program. It's not really 20th century fascism. This is novel in some important ways.

Also, like. Jesus fucking christ.

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're nationalist imperialists. I think that is the term we need. Everything about them makes sense through the lens that they only care about their shitty empire. They'll sacrifice anything, any principles, any people, to preserve their empire. They're not, ideologically, Nazis, but they're American supremacists who aren't that far off.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

A lot of American libs and even "socialists" are just Nazbols: treats and a high living standard for everyone within the nation's borders, death and colonialism for everyone outside of it.

[–] wombat@hexbear.net 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

all palestinian violence against israel is self-defense.

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm for one state solution, from the river to the sea

[–] nasezero@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

Straight to pit barbara-pit for this "person."

[–] DerRedMax@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No results for from:HossamShabat condemn Hamas

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago

If your empathy ends at the border, you don't deserve empathy from outside the border

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

What about Trump? He isn't funding a genocide st the moment. Trump isn't really part of this

[–] bdazman@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

"do you condemn trump?"

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago

"Oh yeah, what about ebil Drumpf? smuglord "