this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
196 points (98.5% liked)

Archaeology

2137 readers
135 users here now

Welcome to c/Archaeology @ Mander.xyz!

Shovelbums welcome. πŸ—Ώ


Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.


About

Archaeology or archeology[a] is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. The archaeological record consists of artifacts, architecture, biofacts or ecofacts, sites, and cultural landscapes.

Archaeology has various goals, which range from understanding culture history to reconstructing past lifeways to documenting and explaining changes in human societies through time.

The discipline involves surveying, excavation, and eventually analysis of data collected, to learn more about the past. In broad scope, archaeology relies on cross-disciplinary research. Read more...

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. No pseudoscience/pseudoarchaeology.



Links

Archaeology 101:

Get Involved:

University and Field Work:

Jobs and Career:

Professional Organisations:

FOSS Tools:

Datasets:

Fun:

Other Resources:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes


Find us on Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Glowstick@lemmy.world 83 points 2 months ago (4 children)

iirc this has been known for a while. We had sex with them so much that they stopped existing as a separate species.

[–] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Garrison would be proud. We truly fucked them to death.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The ones we didn't kill. The more violent killing species is the one that survived. Yay us.

[–] match@pawb.social 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

We have evidence of interbreeding, but how much evidence do we have of violence between humansnand neanderthals?

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Iirc there are no Neanderthal Y-chromosomes left, but there are X-chromosomes, suggesting we killed the males & took the females

This... doesn't really match my understanding.

IIRC there wasn't any real trend. Men and women of either species interbred.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 points 2 months ago

Nothing concrete I don't think. But we do have many thousands of years of racial violence in our collective history so it's not a huge leap of a guess.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

I guess the evidence would come in the history of areas or sites where one group displaced another, perhaps leaving signs of a takeover. I have seen documentaries discussing the differences of the species, and how ours wasn't the physically stronger, but our brain enabled us to plan and communicate better in a conflict or attack. I don't know if that was based on evidence or just speculation using the characteristics we know of the two species.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

yes, and the article mentions it.

if you are on the fence about reading - its a medium length, layman accessible, enjoyable read.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Resulting in me and my 2 percent Neanderthal DNA

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

I know a few

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I definitely know someone who is descended from a neanderthal.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Marjorie Taylor Greene?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No it is, in fact, very likely that his mother has some neanderthal dna. Most of us do

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Shut up, nerd. Let us settle this the way our ancestors intended.

E: Nvm, humor is dead.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I’ve got a bit of Neanderthal DNA, and a lot of folks of Eastern European descent do as well. My ancestors were swingers, I guess.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

There's a fantastic youtube channel by Stephan Milo that does nothing but explore the origins of "humans" (in the very broad sense).

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZ9jWH_8tJ-Nmaj8dSQdEYA

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] optissima@possumpat.io 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago

I can't get th3 camera far enough away to capture it all

[–] Omega_Man@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

How were we able to procreate with a different species? Are there other instances of this in nature?

I thought mating two species created sterile offspring (mules).

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Simply put, it's not that simple.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

That just depends on how the chromosomes match A mule is sterile only because it has 63 chromosomes. A horse has 64 and donkey has 62. .

https://www.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/articles/2007/ask225/

Its amazing what you learn for a school paper decades that sticks with you.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are examples of 2 distinct species (with different chromosome count) creating (sometimes) fertile offspring: https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/en/when-hybrids-are-fertile-3/

But genetically the neanderthalers were far less different from us than those examples. Apparently all modern humans share 99.9% of DNA and neanderthalers shared 99.7% of that. https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/are-neanderthals-and-homo-sapiens-the-same-species

So the no viable offspring rule might not be that good for differentiating species, but that also doesn't mean that neanderthalers and us were not the same species. The more I read on it, the more I think that we were. Apparently we interbred quite a lot over the millennia.

[–] Omega_Man@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is there any way to tell if certain gender-pairs were more common in interspecies mating between sapiens and neanderthals? For example, are we able to tell if the male partner was more or less likely to be sapien or neanderthal?

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I think that might be possible with mitochondrial dna (it always comes from the mother), but I only found 1 speculative source that draws a conclusion: "Nobody today has mitochondrial DNA like that in Neanderthals and, since it’s passed only maternally, this implies that interbreeding was more often between their men and our women." https://aeon.co/essays/what-do-we-know-about-the-lives-of-neanderthal-women

It's an essay, not a research paper, I wouldn't bet any money on this conclusion being correct.

[–] ragica@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Coincidentally just just watched this Gutsick Gibbon (primatologist) vid which touches on this a bit (though not the main topic). https://youtu.be/dy7_LousWVo

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago

Well, this newfound knowledge could have us decide that Neanderthals were not a different species, actually.