this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
461 points (98.3% liked)

News

22890 readers
5274 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Politicians and dog experts are criticizing South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem after she wrote in a new book about killing a rambunctious puppy. The story — and the vilification she received on social media — has some wondering whether she’s still a viable potential running mate for presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Experts who work with hunting dogs like Noem’s said she should have trained — not killed — the pup, or found other options if the dog was out of control. 

Noem has tried to reframe the story from two decades ago as an example of her willingness to make tough decisions. She wrote on social media that the 14-month-old wirehaired pointer named Cricket had shown aggressive behavior by biting.

“As I explained in the book, it wasn’t easy,” she said on X. “But often the easy way isn’t the right way.”

Still, Democrats and even some conservatives have been critical.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 124 points 4 months ago

These nut jobs are so disconnected from reality, thinking telling people a story about killing your own innocent dog will make you look tough.

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 61 points 4 months ago

“As I explained in the book, it wasn’t easy,” she said on X. “But often the easy way isn’t the right way.”

Excuse me? You're trying to convince me that training aggressive behavior out of a dog is the easy way and you chose the high road by killing it??

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 43 points 4 months ago

"I tried nothing, and I'm all out of ideas! *cocks gun*" - Kristi Noem

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago

Yup. Just more and more detail that Republicans have really fucked up morals.

The fact that this immoral dumbass is still trying to defend her complete lack of ability to train or control a dog, and trying to make it as "making hard choices" due to her own utter massive incompetence, is just telling about the mind set of what Republicans look to as moral guidance.

[–] FraidyBear@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Oh look! More proof that most politicians are either psychopaths or idiots being controlled by a rich psychopath. Who the fuck would think a story about killing a nippy puppy would appeal to the common people jfc. I've owned MANY dogs both growing up and as an adult, if you aren't ready to train a dog, especially a smart breed, don't bother getting a dog. Go get a cat or a fish or some shit that can't bite and kill someone.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The dog thing was horrible, But she also shot and killed a goat because it smelled.
Why did the goat smell?
Because she didn't get it castrated.
She pretends to be a farmer with stories about killing dogs that can't hunt and goats that smell weird, But an actual farmer would have had the goat castrated if they weren't planning on breeding it and they absolutely would have just retrained the dog.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Also, she didn’t just kill it. She tortured it. She shot it, and it didn’t die. She then walked over to her truck to get another round, walked back, and shot it again.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's like someone watched Ol' Yeller and completely missed the point that he got rabbies and that he was shot because he wasn't trained.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The dog did exactly what she trained it to do. She was training it to hunt pheasants and she shot it for attacking her friend’s chickens.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was talking about Ol' Yeller, but yeah that lady is just a bad dog owner.

[–] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Well, she was a bad dog owner…

[–] Birdie@thelemmy.club 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

So, I've got a theory. She killed her pup not because it upset her by scattering the birds she hunted, but because it embarrassed her in front of the neighbors when it killed their chickens. Cricket wouldn't listen to her and it made her feel publicly ineffectual and weak. Being made to feel that way absolutely enraged her.

She's a massive POS and I really hope this ends her career.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I really hope this ends her career.

I don't think it will. Conservatives are completely fine with killing dogs and cats at whim. The only reason they are backing off a bit here is because it was a puppy and they are having trouble making that look good. They will get over it quickly, though, as they don't actually have anything against killing puppies.

This is all about appearing to take the high-road. In the future, when this is brought up, they will say she was a "strong leader" for doing what needed to be done. Defending her will be seen as a "bold stance" against the "woke PETA mob".

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

This was precisely my take. This was narcissistic rage and she can’t even see it.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

I'd hate to think what would have happened if her children had trouble with potty training.

"Some might think shooting a toddler is cruel, but 3-years-old is way too old to still be in diapers. Hard decisions had to be made, people."

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 25 points 4 months ago

Cruelty is the point.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Gives me some hope for the world that everyone hates dog killers

[–] feedmecontent@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Even non-psychopaths who aren't dog people. When I encounter a dog, any dog, I couldn't be more uncomfortable. But I don't find this sort of thing any less shocking than people who have and love dogs.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Conservatives don't hate dog killers. They love to brag about killing things, including dogs and cats. It's all just part of being a piece of shit conservative. But, the conservatives can sense that it looks bad to openly brag about killing a puppy. They just haven't figured out a way to make it look good yet. So they are backing away from her for the moment.

But, mark my words... They will eventually circle back and reframe puppy-killing as "so brave and strong" for doing "what needed to be done".

[–] modcolocko@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 4 months ago
[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

It sounds like it was easy. What's she call her literal killing grounds, "the gravel pit"? No, ma'am, even though Wu is for the children, no child should be aware of your gravel pit.

That dog was too young from what she expected from it. Her reason does not hold up.

[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 months ago

I hope someday she gets to experience the treatment she provided to the animals in her care.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 5 points 4 months ago

Her füher would disapprove.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

So when politicians support tons of policies that harm, starve, and needlessly incarcerate millions of living American humans, no big deal, but if one fucking dog gets harmed suddenly we give a shit.

Cool. Our empathy for our fellow man definitely isn't broken at all.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 31 points 4 months ago

It's not hard to understand at all. There's a couple things at work here: first, humans are terrible at connecting emotionally to long term consequences. That's why a disaster that kills 100 people will always elicit a stronger reaction than a policy that will kill millions.

Another thing happening is how humans subconsciously justify things to themselves. An adult could have "deserved" whatever happened, but there's no way a puppy did.

I think it's dogs tickling the same parts of our brains as kids, which would go towards explaining the similar reactions.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Inability to be empathetic and kind to animals is a psychopathic trait. People who don't want to and wouldn't hurt humans, wouldn't hurt animals either. But those who want to hurt humans will usually resort to hurting animals because they can get away with it more easily. (especial treatment for small mammals and pets as they are the emotionally closest to us)

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net -4 points 4 months ago

Carnists: nervous glance

[–] Sidyctism@feddit.de 11 points 4 months ago

The point isnt human vs dog, its direct vs indirect action. People are a lot more disgusted by murderers than the person that put out the hit.

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

People kinda suck. I've never met a dog I didn't like. (this is slight sarcasm)

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That article definitely reads like written by a republiQan

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 months ago

Even if I was heartless enough to kill my own dog I like to think I have the presence of mind to not brag about it afterwards.

[–] FatTony@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You know, from afar she kind of looks like that girl from the Vampire Diaries.

[–] Retreaux@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

She looks like Evil Sarah Chalke, non sequitur aside.