this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
397 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2941 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

France says Russia can be represented but president will not be invited because of war in Ukraine

Russia will be invited to send representatives to an international ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of D-day – but not Vladimir Putin, the French organisers have announced.

The Élysée is reported to have accepted that the country should be represented but said its leader is not welcome because of Moscow’s ongoing war on Ukraine.

“In view of the circumstances, President Putin will not be invited to take part in the commemorations of the Normandy landings,” the Liberation Mission organising committee said.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 55 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The DDay landing was the greatest war event for the Americans, British and Canadians but compared to what happened on the Eastern front, the Russians basically bled themselves and the Germans dry by the time the Allies started fighting again.

I have family that were part of the landings and war veterans that took part in the fighting later on and a couple that are buried in Belgium.

DDay is an amazing story but it shouldn't be overshadowed by what the Russians and Eastern Europeans endured in the east for almost three years.

The reason I mention this is that to the Russians DDay is not as important a WW2 event to them as it is to us. Putin and Russia won't be as disrespected as we would like to imagine because they have way more WW2 commemorative events that saw many more people die than they did on DDay.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yep. I imagine most nations on the Eastern Front see D-Day as "A group of Allies poked head through backyard doggy door and said, "Oi!" Day."

[–] batmaniam@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Hollllllllly... I knew about the atrocities in China... But I didn't understand the scale...

[–] Malek061@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The soviets owe their existence to the United States.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The Allies owe their WW2 victory to the Russians

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 11 points 7 months ago

Soviets* ;)

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

The Russians owe their WW2 victory myth to Ukraine.

[–] Malek061@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Not at all. Moscow falls without American trucks, trains, airplanes, boots, clothes.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If Hitler had mustered up just enough wisdom to realize that an invasion of the USSR would be disastrous and managed to contain his hatred of communism just enough to restrain himself from operation Barbarossa, he could likely have held most of Europe and a DDay type landing would have been unlikely to succeed. Nothing short of a nuclear bombardment of Europe would have dislodged them. One of the weirdest darkest historical hypotheticals. It's amazing how much of history hinges on the personal flaws of specific leaders.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

There are archive tapes of Hitler explaining why Germany should invade Russia. Hitler was running out of oil and was sure that Stalin would block access.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 7 months ago

There's also the fact that in some ways, it was about making sure the Russians didn't take all of Europe. Italy was in Allied control by then, but the ways through the alps to the rest of Europe are choke points that are easily defended, and have known by military strategists since at least Roman times. If the Russians take Berlin and end Hitler, and France is still otherwise under German control, what then? Better go liberate France and as much of Germany as possible to make sure the Russians don't get it.

[–] GenEcon@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I personally think the role of the soviet union in WW2 is underappreciated, too! But thats my point: soviet union, not Russia! The majority of victims in WW2 where Ukrainians, Latvians, Estonians, Poles, Belarusians and Lithuanians – the same countries now fighting Russia (except for Belarusia)!

Russia never was the good guy and Putin deserves nothing of the praise for the soviet unions role in WW2. Maybe invite the Poles, Ukrainians or Baltics insteac!

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 49 points 7 months ago

Fools, invite him and then give him a free visit to The Hague.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 40 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In theory, that's up to the French state.

In practice, Putin wouldn't go to a state that wouldn't agree to extend diplomatic immunity to him.

And France isn't going to grant diplomatic immunity and violate it.

So there isn't really a scenario where he's going to go and then France is going to arrest him. Either France doesn't grant diplomatic immunity and he doesn't enter France, or France does grant diplomatic immunity and he passes through without issue.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (5 children)

How much of a shitshow would it cause if France granted diplomatic immunity, and then the US carried out a special drone delivery operation?

[–] avater@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

How much of a shitshow would it cause if France granted diplomatic immunity, and then the US carried out a special drone delivery operation?

why using a drone? Take him to the Eifel tower, I mean it does not have windows but it gets the job done.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 12 points 7 months ago

"Hey, Vladimir, wanna go up ze Eiffel Tower?"

[–] force@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

the nondefenestrative nature of the structure saddens me

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, wouldn't that be a direct strike against France? NCD would love this.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's kinda like swatting a mosquito off your friend. Might startle them a bit at first, but once they see the intentions were good, they'll understand.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 5 points 7 months ago

It would most likely mean the end of NATO, and potentially a lot of other US alliances. It would also make no sense, since the US could kill Putin in Russia if they really wanted to. They don't want to because MAD.

[–] Enoril@jlai.lu 2 points 7 months ago

Well US bases and operations (fligths etc) are not welcome here since general DeGaulle so they would be intercepted when entering our countrie borders.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 7 months ago

"[WR - any%] Make France ally with Russia and invade Germany"

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

He most probably would now. During the first stage of the invasion, Macron was amenable to Putin and agreed to meet in person. He's totally flipped 180 now though, knowing he got played like a damn fool for trusting him.

[–] Enoril@jlai.lu 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When the first stage of the invasion started, Macron was the president of Europe. So he had to play his role and present the view of the european leaders, even if it was not aligned with our internal views.

I don’t like him, didn’t vote for him the first time (2nd time i did vote for him to avoid marine le pen election, founded by russian banks btw...) but you can’t use his behavior (amenable), trying to avoid escalation, as "yeah i’m your buddy putin, go ahead" or "i totally trust you’.

Our head of intelligence was fired because HE didn’t present the invasion as realistic (based on normal logic it really silly)... but the whole intel community was fully aware of putin desires. President included. He knew Putin was playing with him. Everybody knew.

But he had to play his role, as EU leader at this time.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Unfortunately the average person struggles to understand a Tic-Tac-Toe aspect of politics let alone the two-dimensional chess of politics.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Attempting to apply anything resembling personal values to Macron is an error.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

If you look up "amoral opportunist" in the dictionary, there's a picture of Macron smiling as smugly as is humanly possible.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, LOLing at this. He wouldn't set foot in any country that participates in the ICC with an open international warrant out for his arrest. I think that whole thing is symbolic, though, since no host country is likely to risk open warfare with Russia by detaining their president, criminal charges notwithstanding.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago

I dunno, France actually might arrest him right now.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Or would it go like Stalin when those who were present when he collapsed could have saved him but decided instead to do nothing?

I'd think that those who have enough power in Russia to launch a rescue war might decide instead they are better off without him. But it does depend on what kind of dead man switches he has set.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

There you go, giving us hope we don't deserve.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Russia will be invited to send representatives to an international ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of D-day – but not Vladimir Putin, the French organisers have announced.

“In view of the circumstances, President Putin will not be invited to take part in the commemorations of the Normandy landings,” the Liberation Mission organising committee said.

“Russia will, however, be invited to be represented so that the importance of the commitment and sacrifices of the Soviet peoples, as well as its contribution to the victory of 1945, can be honoured.”

Putin was invited to and attended the ceremony to mark 70th anniversary of the D-day landings despite Russia’s annexation of Crimea a few months earlier.

At the time, the then French president, François Hollande, said: “You can have differences of opinion with Vladimir Putin but I have never forgotten and never will forget that the Russian people gave millions of lives.”

After the June 2014 commemorations, Putin and the then Ukrainian president, Petro Poroshenko, met at the Élysée for talks after Moscow backed a pro-Russian insurgency in eastern Ukraine.


The original article contains 298 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 41%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!