71
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
71 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22190 readers
311 users here now
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.
Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.
!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I guess the best thing would be if somebody really did all the work and laid out the total per aircraft and per program cost stuff for
---
Ninja edit
The problem of course is if you shared it with libs - they'd balk anyway and refuse to actually debate. They'd say stuff like "These numbers are wild approximations and they are deceptive." As if it matters much if the graphic says planes cost an insane $300b a year but number is "probably the much lower" but still insane $250b. And if you set out the numbers over 10 years - then they complain about stuff like inflation and many details about projects are unknowns.
It makes me think of how libs always think of military budgets as yearly. But they love to slime stuff like m4a by quoting the total huge cost over, say, 20 years.
I think lib responses can basically be boiled down to them taking full advantage of plausible deniability. They'll never admit to themselves or others that they're intellectually dishonest.