this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
179 points (93.7% liked)

News

23268 readers
2789 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

After racking up thousands of dollars in debt, some borrowers are deleting the apps from their phones to avoid getting prodded to spend more.

Many consumers find buying now and paying later a godsend when cash is tight. Others are wishing they’d paid upfront to avoid pain later.

Tia Whiteside, 27, knew she was spending more than she would have without buy now, pay later services — the popular loans that let borrowers split purchases into installments with little or no interest. Planning a day trip to the beach with her 2-year-old son last year, she spent $800 on Amazon purchases including a tent, new outfits and a high-end sandcastle kit with the BNPL provider Affirm.

Whiteside, a Greenville, South Carolina-based behavioral analyst who treats childhood autism, makes good money; she and her husband bring in about $110,000 per year combined. But the $6,000 in BNPL loans she’d racked up over roughly two years felt frivolous, she said, especially because they’re planning to buy their first home.

“I was just seeing my paycheck continually eaten up,” said Whiteside, “and I was like, ‘Where’s my money going?’”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grimsolem@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

So you shouldn't take super high interest loans to buy crap online?

Planning a day trip to the beach with her 2-year-old son last year, she spent $800 on Amazon purchases including a tent, new outfits and a high-end sandcastle kit with the BNPL provider Affirm.

Nvm it was clearly unavoidable.

That report also found Black consumers were 65% more likely to borrow on BNPL than the general population, followed by Hispanic consumers (47%) and female consumers (35%).

Also racist and sexist 🤡

[–] baru@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (4 children)

So you shouldn't take super high interest loans to buy crap online?

In Netherlands they limited the maximum interest rate. Plus borrowers should check if people are credit worthy without that credit score. Basically it is assumed there are enough people who are terrible with their finances. The last bit is preferable over victim blaming.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I have a 800-810 credit score. I have positive networth. I have no mortgage, no student loans and one car loan with less than 5k left. The best interest rate on a credit card i could find was over 18%. I didn't actually apply so the rate might go lower but still, that's criminal imo.

[–] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

All credit cards are 0% if you pay the balance in full every month. Then it's just a matter of if the perks are worth the fees (if that's not something you're already taking advantage of).

Edit: reworded to not use the word balance twice in different contexts.

[–] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Many of them have 'hidden' fees, annual charges etc that add up to a hefty chunk. Interestingly the credit cards offered to high net worth individuals (rich people) have much lower rates and no hidden fees, even things like automatic overdraft protection and robust identity theft protection not offered to the rest of us.

[–] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's a fair point. Credit card companies are not our friends, and it's absolutely in character for them to try and nail us in the fine print.

For my part, I know of my annual fee and the rewards I get more than offset it (though not considerably) but it's certainly not always so clear cut.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes, because they make their money from volume with them, instead of rate. Free overdraft protection being free to people who never overdraft with millions in the same bank....ffs....what a mystery

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

I haven't paid a balance in a decade but here's the thing: I'm probably a small minority of your <250k earners. Combined our household AGI is ~150k so it's anecdotal at best. For those who have to use the card it's stacked so far against them it's insane.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Not in Canada. They're 3 percent but only at purchase. I dont use my cards no more.

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Where do you go when there are maxed ??

[–] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 months ago

Note: I am not a financial expert. And my limited knowledge is for the US credit system.

You want your monthly credit use to be pretty low. I believe under 10% is generally considered good. If you have a low enough limit that maxing it is a concern, then you'll want to limit the amount of your monthly expenses you put on a credit card.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Credit unions offer much lower interest rates. My credit card is 10% interest, and 8% for cash advances.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Credit cards at any interest rate are stupid if you are carrying a balance. Take out a proper loan.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah I've got no one to blame for me not looking into then more. I have a savings account with them for my "car loan" which is just me putting money away for the next car and it's got a great interest rate. I really should move my banking to them but they aren't really local.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I had a 7.99% fixed card for a long time. Then after having a few kids we didn’t use it for a while and I went back to look at it they had raised the rate to 15.99% (this was years ago now). We also have credit over 800. Absolute garbage (yes, I know it’s in the TOS). Dropped them and changed companies to get the same 15.99% rate with other perks since the original didn’t have any.

These CC companies seriously need more regs. They can’t be trusted to do anything in the interest of consumers and don’t deserve their business anymore, quite frankly.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Plus borrowers should check if people are credit worthy without that credit score.

I assume you mean "lenders". I mean, sure, they'll check and they have expertise in finance, but the job of a lender isn't to handle a borrower's personal finances in a sane fashion. The job of a lender is to avoid being defaulted on. Like, they'll permit the absolute maximum amount of debt that they're comfortable with, which probably is more than what a borrower should be comfortable with.

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

That’s pretty recent I think - and it’s only limited to like 30% I think ?

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

In Australia, at least at the beginning, bnpl services managed to bypass all money lending regulations based on the fact that they don't charge interest. I know that there were discussions about fixing that but haven't been following the topic in a while.

Like the other person, I also assume you meant lenders, not borrowers. Lenders WANT people that are terrible with their finances. Visa makes very little with me paying off my credit card in full every month, just some merchant fees. On the other hand plenty of Australians are in constant credit card debt and pay something like 18-22% interest on the money they borrow.

Good on the Dutch government to try and control that.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why is that statistic racist and sexist? Sorry for not getting it.

[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It was sarcasm...also if you add black, hispanics and women together, you basically have the general population except white men.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Why would you add those together? They aren't distinct groups. They overlap.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The main issue is parents (and the school system) aren’t teaching kids about budgeting and how CCs work because they don’t know how it works either. It’s perpetuating.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It says in the article that the loans aren't high interest. They're low to no interest.

[–] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They're no interest if you make the payments, if you miss one and keep a balance they can be 30%, which is how the services make money

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

I'm sorry but you're wrong. The specific BNPL loans being discussed in the article really are 0% interest and don't have late fees. The entire point of the article is that this is so appealing to people that they overextend their finances to get things they don't really need, and then get stuck making payments for years.

[–] echodot 1 points 7 months ago

They work like credit cards. If you pay off the debt then there's no problem, you are essentially just pulling money from the future, when you will have it, into the past, where you don't have it, which can be useful if you 100% know you'll be able to cover your debt by the end of the month.

But if you are going to do that you might as well just have a credit card. Banks love it when you do stuff like that, their all time favorite customers are people who regularly pay off their debts and never require any communication from them. Banks don't like it if they have too many people indented to them, because a certain percentage won't pay off their debt. Banks have other less risky means of making money, mostly through safe mortgages and bank fees.

But these loan companies only make money by people having debt. So the risk reward calculation is different for them, so they actively encourage people to get into debt in a way that banks tend not to.