this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
390 points (85.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35540 readers
24 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ech@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Cartons have plastic too, yeah? Cause plain cardboard isn't staying mess free for long if you fill it with milk. That said, it's probably less plastic, though this is also less plastic than just making the whole jug non-recyclable. Why they don't just make the label recyclable too is beyond me.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The problem is plastic is great for food safety. The way it makes air and water-tight seals, that can easily be broken, is hard to replicate. If cans could open, on their own, the way sealed plastic bottles do, then we could have easier recycling via metal containers. But the self-open cans make sharp edges and nobody's invented a way around that yet.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Incredible idea, LISTEN TO THIS:

Reusable glass bottles with metal caps.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They also make Aluminum "Bottles". There's going to be a plastic gasket on the metal cap, but that's magnitude less plastic then a whole bottle and I already know what salad dressing looks like. Lighter to transport then glass as well. If the supply chain is short, glass can work, but the longer it is, the more sense aluminum is.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sounds perfect. Unless it's true what they say about aluminum toxicity after all.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Aluminum cans have a thin plastic liner. The aluminum toxicity is about aluminum oxide anyway. The main exposure source for that is hygiene products that use it as a whitener.

[–] stockRot@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There are so many other plastic use cases in food storage and transport. Like sure, we can bring back milk men but what about everything else?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wrapping a candy bar in a sealed wrapper.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 months ago

Good one! Industry and consumption problem. Also I assume by candy bars you are referring to chocolate bars.

Industry: could offer chocolate bars in bulk packed sealed boxes or bags with waxy cardboard or paper packaging. This already exists for many independent products. However vendors and producers want to maximize profit on individual wrapped item, preying on weak wills around the cashiers.

Consumption: chocolate bars are bad for you. I'd tax sweets and sugary beverages a similar way we tax tobacco, cannabis and alcohol, so that it can give back to society's increased healthcare costs and dissuade excess consumption via increased prices. Currently producers like Mars, Mondelez and Hershey's get away scott free for poisoning the populace.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did you miss the part about the airtight and watertight seals?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

You mean the ones made out of natural rubber?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So we have all this plastic waste because people can't be bothered to operate a can opener?

[–] ech@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

Basically. Convenience pushes most, if not all, of the packaging changes we see. Plastic has been very good at accomplishing the things people want to be done with packaging at a low, immediate cost to the user. Turns out the long term cost is much more drastic.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because people like you can’t be bothered to respect their fellow humans in terms of use case design.

But yes. Until we find a way to use can openers to keep small amounts of ketchup sterile, it’s because people can’t be bothered to use a can opener.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Sure there's a use case for aluminum cans and and a use case re-usable containers too.

But there's a lot of people like that think that finding a use case that requires plastic for one thing proves that plastic is needed for everything. This is a fallacy.

[–] Teanut@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think they used to wax the cardboard. Maybe they still do?

[–] ech@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Depending on the type of wax used, it could be better, or it could be the same as plastic.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wax or plastic coated paper is still going to use less plastic then a whole plastic judge. Don't make perfect the enemy of better.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

That said, it’s probably less plastic

Did you miss me saying that?

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That's how my milk used to come when I was a little kid.