this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
262 points (89.0% liked)

World News

39110 readers
2549 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KingBoo@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Why is soup the choice rather than dye, ink, or paint?

[–] BBQThunder@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

They knew they couldn't (probably didn't want to) damage the painting itself. The Mona Lisa has been behind bullet proof glass since the mid 90s, so it wasnt a secret. So they chose something that was relevant to their cause and they probably (rightly) guessed that soup would make a headline when paint or dye has been done so many times before that it might not.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Real reason: They’re demanding that France make assurances for access to food.

Fake reason: They’re Warhol fans.

[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Now I want to know if DeVinci had any rivalries with other artists that we could bring back.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They’re bringing attention to food insecurity, so their method is… wasting food. Yea that checks out

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah that one can of soup in Paris would make such a massive difference to worldwide food insecurity lmao

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

There's three types of protestors in the world:

  1. Cause minimal, non serious disruption. Spread the message without pissing people off, because that'll make people more receptive to joining you.

  2. Cause serious disruptions, even if it pisses people off, because it brings attention to the issue makes it impossible to ignore.

  3. Bring attention to an issue at all costs by any means necessary, even if it makes the issue worse or has absolutely nothing to do with the issue. Be an asshole to make people listen.

There's a valid argument that without 2, people won't take something seriously, and mild inconveniences are the whole point of nonviolent protest. It gets a bit morally grey when it would do something like prevent an ambulance from operating though. I don't think anyone who normally waves that away would feel the same if it resulted in the death of a loved one.

And 3 is just clout chasers imo, like in this situation. I can't take someone protesting food insecurity seriously if they're wasting food to do so.

[–] mspencer712@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or one of those laser “pointers” with crazy high power, 1 watt or higher?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

Because they didn't want to cause damage. The target was glass, not the painting.