this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
615 points (98.1% liked)

Fediverse

27828 readers
302 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Found this post super informative as it relates to Mastodon, and thought Lemmy might also benefit from this perspective. I'm not sure I share his optimism, but his points seem sound to dampen some of the alarm bells over Meta joining the Fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] august_senpai@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

IMHO this is 100% the plan. If they play their cards right they stand to take out two birds with one stone (heh). They've already paid celebrities to be on there.

Still, this can only happen if Threads gets massive enough relative to the rest of the fediverse that the incompatibility doesn't hurt them equally.
...that is to say, it's all pretty likely, unless other strong competitors show up with ActivityPub support.

[–] SamC@lemmy.nz 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think Meta really gives a shit about the Fediverse. They are hoping to take out Twitter though, and the Fediverse could be collateral damage.

[–] reclipse@lemdro.id 19 points 1 year ago

Exactly, They don't give a shit about Fediverse.

[–] XpeeN@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So why using acticitypub at the first place?

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Marketing and content boost for the start maybe? Mastodon has come up a lot recently (hell, even in local radio), so Meta can use this to promote their own product. And already have content right there for users joining Threads, it's not a blank slate.

After the initial boost and when sucking up millions of users they can just defederate and have their Facebook (or rather Twitter) 2.0.

[–] Sl00k@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Extra data to scrape through their servers.

[–] SamC@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago

Probably partly to avoid regulatory scrutiny. They can say they're not being monopolistic (even though they 100% are) because they're embracing open standards.

That's why they're not launching in the EU.

[–] RxBrad@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

They're already over 2 million in like 2 hours.