UK Nature and Environment

390 readers

106 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Kim

GreyShuck

Raptor On the Edge of Town (self.nature)

submitted 10 months ago by AngstyPony to c/nature

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

<yoink!> - I'm grabbing this quote from an article @GreyShuck posted: “There is a real need for us to inspire people to connect with nature and to make biodiversity a central part of their lives – particularly in urban areas and less affluent communities” Well I did just that the other day, in a l-o-n-g wait for a bus to turn up. There was a small raptor perching on the streetlights, avidly hunting just before sunset. One time he came over into the trees and dived off them into the undergrowth, but didn't seem to catch anything. It was blunt-tailed, probably a sparrowhawk or a kestrel. This was right on the edge of the urban and less affluent community I live in, around a multi-laned highway. [Re the quote - why in "less affluent areas"?] 🪶

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GreyShuck 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My take would be:

Why in urban areas?

Well over 50% of the population of the UK lives in urban areas now. I was a warden for a remote nature reserve for some years. We would host various groups staying overnight in our hostel - some there for wildlife watching or similar and some because it was close to a nearby arts festival. A lot of the arts groups were mainly urban in background and I could very clearly see the difference. So many people in these groups simply didn't understand what they were looking at around the reserve and didn't place any value on it. I recall one jazz trumpeter who had never spent much time outside of London. 48 hours in to his stay he was climbing the walls. You could hear birds singing. According to him "It's not natural!".

Politicians make policies and allocate funding in light of what their constituents value. If people don't value wildlife the little funding that we currently have is just going to be cut and cut.

Why less affuent areas?

If you are living in a less affluent area, chances are there will be fewer greenspaces around you - and there is plenty of research that shows that access to greenspace improves heath and welbeing in a whole range of ways. Chances are that those greenspaces won't be as well looked after. And chances are that you are going to have less money and less time to spend on transport to take you further afield: to spend time in the countryside or nature reserves where you can connect to wildlife.

[–] AngstyPony 2 points 10 months ago

Yes, it really does all boil down to what people's values are.