this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
416 points (94.8% liked)

Risa

6916 readers
1 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 26 points 11 months ago (5 children)

In a post scarcity society, greed becomes irrelevant.

[–] teft@startrek.website 49 points 11 months ago

This man doesn’t have the lobes for business.

[–] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

If you can't create artificial demand in a utopian society, what kind of Ferangi are you?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Post-scarcity societies are good for business. Rule of Acquisition #74.

[–] teft@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

~~Rule #74 is Knowledge equals profit. Are you reading some pirated copy of the rules?~~

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Don't give Hu-Mons the actual Rules of Acquisition. Rule of Acquisition #23.

[–] teft@startrek.website 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I see this is actually the Grand Nagus’ account. I’m sorry Grand Nagus. My apologies.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Define "post-scarcity". You can't replicate everything (without programmable matter, anyways...), and some raw materials are needed to build the replicators. And latinum is a rare commodity, though I don't know why it's so value beyond its scarcity. Greed will always be there as long as some things remain scarce yet required for a functioning society.

[–] c10l@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Latinum is only valuable outside of the Federation, where societies are not post-scarcity.

Now, before you argue that there are no material conditions demanding scarcity in (some of) them, I’ll add that artificial scarcity is scarcity nonetheless.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In societies outside the Federation, where they don't have replicators, things have value due to being able to use them for other purposes. Latinum has never been shown to be used for any other purpose except to trade. Its not clear why a useless material is considered valuable, except for the fact that its rare.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Says a huh-man that uses paper to trade...

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That paper is at least backed by the GDP of my country.

[–] c10l@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That reminds me of that joke:

Two economists are walking side-by-side.

One tells the other: I’ll give you $100 if you take a shit on the pavement.

He proceeds to shit on the pavement and grab the $100.

He then tells the other economist: I’ll give you $100 if you eat my shit.

The other does the deed and collects his $100.

After walking a few more blocks, one of them says: both of us left our dignity with that work back there and neither of us are any richer!

To which the other responds: no, but we grew our combined GDP to $200.

And they both walked away happy, patting each other on their backs.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

The point is that we understand the actual paper has no value itself. It's the commitment of the government backing it that has the value.

[–] teft@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Latinum is valuable because it can’t be replicated.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but beyond its scarcity, what other purpose does it have? Lots of things are rare and can't be replicated, but their value comes from the need to use them for some purpose such the ability to build other things that you wouldn't be able to build otherwise. Latinum has never been shown as anything more than a currency with nothing behind it to give it value.

[–] teft@startrek.website 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What value does gold have other than it doesn’t rust and it looks pretty?

It’s the same thing essentially. Latinum looks pretty and can’t be replicated therefore it’s a good currency.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Gold is used in a variety of applications. You're likely holding a device filled with gold right now. Even before the computer revolution, is was still used in medical applications. There are tons of uses for gold that don't involve currency.

[–] teft@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yes it does have applications nowadays but when gold was used as a monetary store we didn’t have electronics. Gold was mainly used because it is shiny, easily workable, rare, and never corroded.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

It was shiny, easily workable, and didn't turn your skin green. As a jewelry metal, it was much more valuable than as a currency. It had uses other than just money...

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The microgram of gold in my phone pales in comparison to the gold used in jewellery or hoarded.

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, but again even by your own admission, it has uses other than just currency.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You missed a big advantage of gold: for most of human history, gold was the densest material known to man by a wide margin, making it very easy to verify that a piece of purported gold is real.

[–] Guildo@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Irrelevant, but it still exists.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When everyone has unlimited access to stuff, one person wanting more does not deprive others of anything so it does not matter if it exists.

IE: In a post scarcity society, greed becomes irrelevant.

[–] Guildo@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

but it still exists - even in Star Trek

[–] c10l@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

You’re arguing against a straw man. They never said it ceases to exist, only that it’s irrelevant.