this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
691 points (97.5% liked)

News

23284 readers
3999 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sarah Katz, 21, had a heart condition and was not aware of the drink’s caffeine content, which exceeded that of cans of Red Bull and Monster energy drinks combined, according to a legal filing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stuka@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They are not incredibly dangerous, not be a long shot.

They can be dangerous to a very small subset of people with preexisting conditions and that's about it.

[–] echodot 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The trouble is quite a lot of people have the pre-existing condition of being brainless. So they mainline 5 cans in a row, if you do that with Coke nothing happens, if you do that with Monster even a healthy person is going to have heart problems.

Also some prat had a great idea of mixing it with Yeager. Thus mixing two of the most disgusting liquids in the world together. But more importantly mixing a stimulant and a suppressant, which again can have serious health risks even for otherwise healthy individuals.

We don't sell glue to children even though most of them probably won't sniff it. So why do we tolerate energy drinks for them? The lasting kids need is to be even more hyper.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Mine is cannabis and booze. Never mix something that makes me want to throw up with something that settles the stomach. If I drink too much I want it out of my body ASAP.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"They are not incredibly dangerous, except for when they are incredibly dangerous"

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

By that logic, peanuts are also "incredibly dangerous".

Note: I'm not promoting or condoning the consumption of energy drinks, they are generally unhealthy. But calling them "incredibly dangerous" because they can evoke such a reaction in a small subset of the population is bullshit.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And products are often labeled, not if they CONTAIN nuts, but even if they were made somewhere that also produces peanuts and there's a slight chance of cross contamination.

This is done because of the liability. It should be easy enough to prove the Panera has liability here in the same way.

[–] CaptFeather@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It clearly states the caffeine content on the placard in front of the drink though, and it's called charged lemonade. While that wouldn't necessarily imply it has caffeine, that's at least enough to tell me it's almost certainly not plain lemonade though and I should read what's in it.

[–] Salad_Fries@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And vitamin water surely is loaded with vitamins, right?

[–] CaptFeather@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

While that wouldn't necessarily imply it has vitamins, that's at least enough to tell me it's almost certainly not plain water though and I should read what's in it.

[–] Stuka@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Um...they do have vitamins soo..

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Thats a stupid as fuck argument.

Know whats on the label, and in fact, in the name, of peanut butter/peanut products?

Peanuts

and they even still have a specific warning, for extra special stupid people, that says "warning, contains peanuts"

What was on the label of Charged Lemonaid? Of Monster?

No Indicators, No Warnings, No nothing.

Miss me with this bullshit false equivalency.

[–] Jaigoda@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You clearly didn't read the article, or actually look at basically any energy drink can. The label of the charged lemonade does in fact list exactly how much caffeine is in each drink, as well as stating it contains as much caffeine as their dark roast coffee.

And Googling the label on a Monster Energy Drink can, there is a label stating that the total caffeine content is 120mg with a warning recommending against consumption by children or those sensitive to caffeine.

[–] ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago

Both Monster and the Charged lemonade have labels that say "contains caffeine" you know if you had a heart problem and your doctor said not to consume large amounts of caffeine maybe you would read that label just like the peanuts.

[–] OKRainbowKid@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

At least you chose an appropriate username.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it not credible that a small slice of people might be extra sensitive to something that the rest of the population can handle without issue?

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have never been sensitive to caffeine, or had any underlying issues.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Just based on that experience with half of a Monster, I'd consult a doctor to verify that.

[–] Stuka@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You dont read so good