this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
1507 points (98.3% liked)

Fediverse

29502 readers
2807 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 36 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Signal is centralized, loops is closed source and not accepting new users.

[–] Esmoreit@lemmings.world 13 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Loops will be open sourced later they say.

Is Loops open source? It will be! We plan on open sourcing the platform after it reaches a stable and easy to maintain state.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That really is not a satisfying answer. It is incredibly nebulous and even if it did have a nice definition I guarantee most software developers will tell you a lot of software rarely reaches that state.

I can see why they might want to avoid 1000 GitHub issues bike shedding things but they could open source the code and just not have open contribution

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

or they can also disable submitting issues for now

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That means very little to me. Actions speak louder than words, and it would probably help the development of loops if it was actually open source.

[–] MrRazamataz@lemmy.razbot.xyz 3 points 10 hours ago

Made by the same dev as Pixelfed, which did a similar thing.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Loops is anti-libre software confirmed.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 hours ago

anti? is it against libre software? because it doesn't seem so

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Why does software have a political stance?

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It's missing a libre software licence text file.

[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I was told that unless you self host, matrix is less secure because it leaks more metadata. Something to consider

[–] callyral@pawb.social 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Leaks more metadata? What does that mean?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

sender, recipient, chatroom, what kind of event you sent (message, emoji, reaction, vote), if you responded to a message, room privilege changes, etc

but it's a question how big of a problem is that. they want to tackle it in the future, but that's far away for now I think

[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Damm, didn't know that, good to know

[–] breadcat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

it's not even true information, the new tech stack is zero trust

[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

What does this mean?