this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
534 points (84.9% liked)

196

1812 readers
3230 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

In case you're asking out of good faith curiosity:

Tankie is a pejorative (and rightfully so) term for a particular brand of communist/socialist. It's worth noting that I have nothing against communists or communism in general (even though I don't agree with it as a political system). A tankie is someone whose standpoint is that communism can do no wrong; anything that went wrong in USSR and China is CIA's fault, and the Czechs, Hungarians, and Tibetans had it coming.

Oh, and to any tankies who are reading this and are tempted to engage in sealioning, don't bother - I don't care and probably won't respond. Plus there's a pretty good chance you're already on my block list. Call me fascist if you will (I'vebeen called worse things), but at least tell me a definition of fascism that doesn't also encompass todays China and Russia

Basically, it's a label applied to people of a communist persuasion who have given up on any form of critical thinking, and just defaults to "America bad, therefore anything opposing it must be good". Yes, America bad indeed. But that doesn't automatically Pol Pot, Kim Young Un, and Stalin are good.

Also, don't be surprised if this comment is downvoted to oblivion after someone links it on hexbear or lemmygrad. It's quite telling that comments like this are usually attacked based on syntax rather than substance, while refusing to actually explain what happened at Tianmen Square or during the Holodomor, without citing russian or Chinese propaganda.

Also, the name is a reference to communist countries sending tanks against civilians, RE: Hungary 1956, Prague 1968, and Tianmen Square 1989

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Just a friendly suggestion. Leninism isn't communism. Don't give them what they want by referring to them as communist. It gives actual communist/anarchist even more undeserved grief and misinformation to counter.

Leninism often referred to as ML is an authoritarian ideology. Which is a socialist in name only. They will gladly sacrifice actual socialism to protect the ruling Vanguard ala the tankies. Claiming their ideology is to facilitate building an economy that can then somehow transition to communism. They have no outline or mechanism for this to happen. In fact they would kill most anyone who tried. As those people would be a threat to the Vanguard.

Communism is a classless stateless society. A Society with a separate Vanguard party has classes. And authoritarian state is not stateless. Therefore they are not communist no matter how much they use the term. You are spot on with everything else though.

[–] _bac@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well the 'America bad for the world' is arguably not wrong.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

True. The problem is their thought process is "therefore every country that's adversarial to the US is good" including Russia, China, North Korea, etc.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a leftist pinko card-carrying Democratic Socialist of America, I can't agree that Tankies are on this side of the fence. I think they're all either brainwashed or trolling... Either way, they have no idea what they're saying most of the time.

That being said, they've ruined the ability for some of us to give honest constructive criticism of the American left.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What does "pinko" mean in this context? (Or any context, for that matter... can't recall having heard that term before)

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

TIL...

I shy away from defining myself on the left/right axis, as this depends a lot on where you are and what is defined as the center. But let's just say I'd love to hang out with Bernie.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I'm certainly not a "Liberal." They are not the same thing.

Libs in the USA are right-of-center. Examples in my mind are Pelosi or Schumer. The ones who kowtow to business interests and pay lip service to social injustices while doing nothing in their personal life or legislative maneuvering to support it.

And while I agree the bidirectional "left" or "right" thing isn't ideal, and the Compass method is only slightly better, I am far better described as Leftist than I am anything else. I fall more inline with the Scandinavian countries' left than that of the USA's.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't it more than that though? A lot of the US intervention stuff can be true, but I thought the whole thing that made a tankie a tankie was the support of an authoritarian dictatorship and wanting that to be implemented?

Like I totally believe the US does and will try to destroy any communist country that arises, but I dont support the idea of a "dictatorship of the proletariat" so hopefully that doesn't make me a tankie lol

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

True. I just tried to give a short primer. I am indeed part of (to an extent) the "America bad"-camp, but it doesn't make me sverve so hard I crash into a ditch on the opposite side.

[–] will_steal_your_username@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

haha, love that picture!

Edit: Also I think hexbear and lemmygrad can't downvote due to being defederated from blåhaj.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Ah, I wasn't aware of said defederation. Good on Blåhaj

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I love all the whackadoo shapes like stethoscope, horseshoe, and fishhook that people are forced to use to cling to the notion that political ideology is linear.

There are two legislative variables- societal and economic. That requires two axes for accurate plotting, and why it’s so difficult to fit an authoritarian socialist on a line that is primarily determining a socialized vs. conservative economy.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago

Realistically, even the political compass is a vast simplification of how real politics works. We usually visualise most mainstream democratic parties on the y=x line on the compass, but there are almost as many exceptions to that guideline as there are examples of it.

For example, left leaning parties overwhelmingly are more likely to support gun control or anti-hate-speech laws, although those are essentially authoritarian social policies. And conservatives support left-economic policies like restricting companies' ability to moderate their content as they see fit. Or their support of the army, which is an enormous government-run organisation.

But still, yeah, having a 2d set of axes gives you a much better look at where parties sit in relation to each other than trying to visualise it on a single line.