this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
133 points (98.5% liked)

World News

39595 readers
1986 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Italian police in Brescia face allegations of degrading treatment after seven female climate activists from Extinction Rebellion claimed they were forced to remove their underwear and perform squats during questioning.

The activists, detained after a protest against Leonardo, an aerospace company, accused police of singling out women for this treatment.

Police denied misconduct, stating the procedure was to search for dangerous objects.

The incident has prompted calls for an investigation from opposition politicians amid debates over a controversial security bill targeting climate activists with harsher penalties.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

From the same article

United States edit

In the United States, Bell v. Wolfish is the benchmark case on this issue. In its judgment of the case, the U.S. Supreme Court established a standard of reasonable grounds for performing cavity searches. Among these are security concerns at prisons. Such searches are generally governed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits searches without probable cause.[3]

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 7 hours ago (3 children)
[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] thejml@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago

“Everything’s legal in New Jersey”

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The point of the matter is the previous poster said that it was standard, my response proved it wasn't.

If you read even the summary you will see that it wasn't uniformly implemented.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's your loose interpretation of "it's standard" that's tripping you up. US case law has no relevance on what's standard in Italy.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

From the summary:

The activists, detained after a protest against Leonardo, an aerospace company, accused police of singling out women for this treatment.

Any other arguments that are D.O.A?

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You should ask yourself that question.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Lol, doesn't read the summary, uses overly broad terms and then points the finger at someone else.

Are ya sure?

Lmao. Rofl even.