this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
519 points (93.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35768 readers
185 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (8 children)

„I don’t want to watch ads and I want everything to be free.”

My brother in christ, this is not how services work.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It wouldn't be so bad if the ads were reasonably placed.

Don't target people who come in from another domain or on the first viewed video. Pre- roll ads after that. Most importantly, ad breaks at creator-defined times only. Sick of ads coming in at arbitrary times in the middle of a sentence. That's the worst part of it, IMO.

Oh and a time limit on ads. That has to happen too.

Also could somebody tell all the streaming companies that they know what language I watch all my videos in and to stop giving me Spanish language ads? Like, I got no problem with other languages, I just really feel like you're wasting your advertisers money showing them to people who don't know a quesadilla from a carton of pickles.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I was fine with it back when it was just one ad that you could skip.

I was fine with it back when it was just two ads that you could skip.

I was fine with it back when it was just two ads, and you could skip one, and the other was 5 seconds long. 10 was a stretch, but I'm patient.

Without an adblocker, now it's playing an unskippable, 10+ seconds long ad at the start AND at the end. Some ads are as long as 20 seconds. If the video is long enough, it dares to abruptly play an ad right in the middle. You can't skip that one, either. We're back to television content-to-ad ratios - the exact thing I was happy to dump once there was enough content on YouTube. I was patient. That wasn't enough for them. They can suck a beehive.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

I can be patient if the content is >10min long.
If I need to watch an ad for every 2-5min video of streamer clips I'd go balistic as that are even more ads than the broadcast tv nonsense.

[–] Kyatto@leminal.space 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We’re back to television content-to-ad ratios

I hate ads too but we're not there yet. When I stopped watching tv it was like at least 30% ads and I am sure it got worse the decade after I quit while it was still relevant.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder if it's (about) the same in every country but I stopped watching it a long time ago (over a decade). If it got even worse then there's no way I'm ever going back, but it was too much for me below that 30%.

[–] Kyatto@leminal.space 1 points 21 hours ago

Fair, the only reason I was watching that long was because I was just a young child, once I was able to provide for my own entertainment I never looked back to TV.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Free-at-point-of-service is a common feature of amenities provided by countries with socialist economies.

But they only work when the economy is actively managed. If you're just pumping cash into a big banking machine and telling people to grab for it, you're not incentivizing any particular economic activity. You're just encouraging entrepreneurs to get particularly good at snatching money out of the air and elbowing one another in the face.

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca -3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well companies do need to make money, yeah

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, they have enough money. They won capitalism. Billions in profit. Fuck advertisements. Directly support the creators in your life.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder 1 points 1 day ago

That turns out to be a lot more expensive, personally I'd get a lot less useful content/content I enjoy. I do chip in to a few patreons etc, but realistically someone like Karl Jobst or Levy Rozman or many other creators that I use to plug a 10 minute hole between tasks would likely get nothing from me because £10/mo is a lot for maybe 1-2 hours use a month.

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Companies don't need to make infinite money. That's just a weird incentive that modern corporations seem to be chasing and burning everything down around them to achieve.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The Stock Market. It's an inherent consequence of being a company that rapidly filled a new niche and being publicly traded. A private company wouldn't have grown as quickly, but could in theory, transition into a steady state monetary model. The investors expect the same quarterly reports every single time and will not be satisfied with dividends. The founders might have pushed out long ago and executives who make the decisions have no long term commitment to the company, so they have no reason not to crash the company into the ground trying to wring every ounce out of their customer base.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 day ago

they already did

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I don't mind paying. Except if it's evilcorp. Which it is.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It would be fine if there were so many ads

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

According to Google, YouTube had made US$15.1 billion in ad revenue in 2019, […] nearly 10% of the total Alphabet revenue

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube#Finances quoting https://abc.xyz/assets/investor/static/pdf/2019Q4_alphabet_earnings_release.pdf?cache=05bd9fe

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

But have you considered how clever you look if you simp for the bourgeoisie?

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Lol, yep that's how it works in tha GAFAM ecosystem because YOU ARE THE PRODUCT. So I'm not giving a dime to google but I'm hapoy to support creators directly.