this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
724 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39385 readers
2562 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

France’s Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor, its most powerful at 1,600 MW, was connected to the grid on December 21 after 17 years of construction plagued by delays and budget overruns.

The European Pressurized Reactor (EPR), designed to boost nuclear energy post-Chernobyl, is 12 years behind schedule and cost €13.2 billion, quadruple initial estimates.

President Macron hailed the launch as a key step for low-carbon energy and energy security.

Nuclear power, which supplies 60% of France’s electricity, is central to Macron’s plan for a “nuclear renaissance.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. I love the French, our dear EU brothers and sisters, but just don't buy a nuclear power plant from them.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They have a lot of them and they work perfectly well, who are you buying it from? The USA? Germany?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Microsoft is restarting 3 Mile Island...

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hinkley point in the UK. Massive overruns,built by the French

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Thing is there's only four manufacturers of reactors in Europe:

  • French/Japanese Framatome
  • Italian/Chinese Ansaldo Energia
  • Czech/Korean Doosan Skoda
  • German/Russian Nukem

The 44% Chinese part of Ansaldo and the 100% Russian ownership of Nukem is probably not doing either company any favors. That leaves you with Doosan Skoda and Framatome. Considering a nuclear reactor project isn't build in less than a decade, and given the choice between a company that has built several modern reactors and a company that is first in line for a visit from dear old uncle Vlad and haven't commissioned a reactor in 22 years, I'd say that the French is the best bet.

So that the French built the reactor is only logical. That it got delayed to the extreme, that's just what happens when you don't buy a reactor of the rack.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All nuclear plants get over budget or the political party doesn't seem to make the budget accepted.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So why throw cash at them?