this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
222 points (89.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27100 readers
2299 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Afaik this happened with every single instance of a communist country. Communism seems like a pretty good idea on the surface, but then why does it always become autocratic?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's a bit cheap to just try and blame all the problems on the opposition with no evidence though.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

We did kind of spend 60 years demonizing, embargoing, and physically destroying communist countries.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

People are blind to the current propaganda, too. Just look at how many articles demonize China every day, which has never bombed a country, while ignoring other authoritarian countries and their imperialism that bomb countries every day (like Saudi Arabia or Turkey). Meanwhile, we need to turn to sources like Al Jazeera to find out what's happening in Israel with our own government money. Just look at how freaked out the country got to Bernie Sanders and how the capitalist class (including the media) closed ranks to stop him. Look at how the US treats Cuba and Biden still signed a law against them. Until Russia's war, the most sanctioned countries were all communist (Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela) while other authoritarian countries got a pass. But nobody notices. The propaganda has never stopped.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I agree with all of that but China is literally trying to bully everyone else out of the South East Asia Ocean area and is working hard to build up a Navy that can project force. They aren't Cuba.

[–] Rogue 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No evidence? Aren't there a ridiculous number of cases where the CIA openly destabilised communist regimes?

[–] frazorth 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The CIA openly destabilises monarchies, republics and democracies as well.

There is little evidence that the CIA specifically targets communist countries, more that they target anything thats not America.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

You should check out Willam Blum's "Killing Hope" (pdf link), and/or "America's Deadliest Export", by same (pdf link).

“During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime's atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn't go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”

― Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

.. Dude, I don't know if you've heard about this thing, but it was pretty big. They called it "the cold war".

[–] frazorth 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't say they didn't overthrow Communist governments.

You may have heard of this thing called Iran? They aren't picky about who they hurt.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

The argument for Iran was that Mossadegh was "turning towards communism". Same for Allende, same for Arbenz. Hell, just the concept of "domino theory" was all about stopping the spread of communism. Pretending they were some sort of equal opportunity saboteurs is deeply disingenuous.

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It would be if it wasn't extremely well documented.

It's definitely not impossible that communist regimes would consolidate into dictatorships on their own but if it was a guaranteed thing then the CIA wouldn't have spent so much time and effort making it happen.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Of course they would. And communist regimes literally did consolidate into dictatorships on their own from the very beginning. At the end communism is inherently authoritarian, which is the core problem.

The current downfall of capitalism could likewise be blamed on Russian influence to make it look less awful, which is likewise documented. While it holds truth it still is a really bad argument.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago

They didn't sprout from nothing. Even from the beginning, they were being interfered with by capitalist and anti-revolutionary forces who started out with all the money and resources, like the white army or the black hundreds, not to mention being neighbors with reactionary imperialist countries, like Germany, and coming from authoritarian countries, like Tsarist Russia, where those ruling elements (old regime nobles, business interests, rich landowners, generals, etc) still existed and were in power or at least a place to sabotage the effort.

[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Capitalist countries have never tried to stop communist ones? Holy bad take

[–] iii@mander.xyz -2 points 19 hours ago

Communist countries have tried to stop monarchies, democracies, capitalist, communist, too.

What makes communist countries special in that they turn out authoritarian, and the reverse, a communist country trying to stop a capitalist democracy, not?