this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
342 points (96.2% liked)

World News

39127 readers
3441 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk labeled Britain a “tyrannical police state” on X, criticized Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s leadership, and questioned the imprisonment of far-right activist Tommy Robinson.

Musk’s comments coincide with his role as a key adviser to Trump, raising concerns in the U.K. about its relationship with the incoming administration.

Musk also criticized Starmer’s policies, including increased farm inheritance taxes, and boosted far-right content on X.

This follows similar clashes with other U.S. allies, including Germany and Australia, over their domestic policies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reality_Suit@lemmy.world 188 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

He's a Russian asset that holds U.S. military contracts. yay

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 65 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Just wait until he uses DOGE to gut NASA and gets more contracts for SpaceX.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That department doesn’t even exist tho. Yet at least

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I think he’d be more likely to fund more NASA projects since they contract it out to SpaceX anyway.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

It's likely going to be a bit of both.

It would be extremely convenient for Muskrat if NASA no longer had the engineering budget to design their own rockets while simultaneously having a higher budget for private contractors.

It would be extremely easy to sell the idea to people who don't look past the raw numbers, too. Frame it as though NASA is spending $400 million on projects that have already been done by the private sector and propose half of it gets reallocated to contracting and the other half gets cut to lower expenses. Musk sycophants will praise him for being a genius, MAGA morons will congratulate him on being "efficient" and fixing the economy, and he'll have his nice little oligarchy just like he wanted.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

Definitely. He’ll try to get SLS cancelled because he owns its competitor.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

NASA does a lot. He wants all their funding.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

The only thing Elon wants that NASA does is Mars.