this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
848 points (97.7% liked)

memes

10398 readers
2280 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rhacer@lemmy.world 168 points 1 week ago (4 children)

But it IS how we see prices. If there weren't science behind it, they wouldn't be doing it.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 88 points 1 week ago (3 children)

A lot of marketing strategies are pseudoscience. Just like a lot police investigation practices or body language assumptions.

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

JC Penny kinda showed that no. It isn’t pseudocience

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's the story about JC Penny?

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The CEO decided that clients were smart intelligent people and treated people as adults. Aka, no discounts, no 99 pricing, it just costs what it costs, as low as we can make it, plus our margin.

JC Penny was already not too well, this helped sink them

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

It was less about the .99 pricing and more about "Sale" pricing and 'coupons'. Retailers will put a pair of pants on "Sale" for 50% off 51 weeks out of the year and people think they're getting a great deal whereas when it's not half off, they just don't buy.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Poor guy. Tried to do some good in the world and paid the price for it. Nobody ever went broke overestimating the stupidity of the average person.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

"Why would I pay $25 for these pair of pants at full price when I could pay $24.99 for those [identical] pants that are half off?! Clearly, that's the better deal!"

Hell, could probably even make it $29.99 for the identical pants and people will still go with that because they think they're paying five more bucks and getting a $60 pair of pants

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some marketing strategies are pseudoscience, but this one isn't.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Does anyone in the thread have actual info to back this up?

[–] SuperEars@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This doesn't meet the bar you want, but my marketing professor called the .99 idea the single greatest thing to come out of marketing in a century.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Sounds about right.

Marketing hasn't done anything positive for humanity. It is all just to manipulate people into buying shit they don't need. It is the main driver for the overconsumption.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You should be able to find various tests and studies of this phenomenon on Google

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] criitz@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago

It's a yes but find it yourself

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago

I was watching a PBS documentary about the first humans in the Americas. All the scientists are super cool until you get to the American anthropologist who starts using phrenology to explain why Native American tribes shouldn't be given repatriation rights, only for a Danish geneticist to say "yeah, this is absolutely a Native American and i am willing to testify to that in any court of law"

Pseudoscience is still all the rage if it can be used to push a political agenda.

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

But it IS how we see prices.

I don't. Never did. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

[–] skizzles@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Same, I've always just rounded up. Even when it comes to things like .50¢ I still just round it up to the next dollar.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You do though

At some level you will favor the 19.99. You might justify it with some other rational but there will be the bias.

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, I dont though.

It really depends on the study you choose to believe into. (No, everyone does it, isn't a pro argument. People always had strange beliefs which later changed. I think it's called major consensus narrative or maybe consensus reality

I like this hill, I'll stay here. Thank you.)

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No, I really don't.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

The science is about how you initially react to the number. Your brain will see $19, and immediately you'll think it's $19. Only upon further inspection and processing through your cognition, you recognise that its $19.99, which is basically $20.

It's that initial reaction they want, to grab your attention. Anyone who is going through life without leveraging their higher thinking will fall for this shit. Anyone who thinks, at all, won't.

Unfortunately, there's a nontrivial number of people who fall into that first category. People who were never taught to think. They just do.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

dowsing for suckadrippas