this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
758 points (85.9% liked)

Political Memes

5428 readers
2154 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wish this would be adjusted for age. Obviously someone who had more time to accumulate wealth will have more wealth. The real question is how much wealth does each generation have at the same age.

I am working off of one bar and have no electricity but this research has been done. I think pew has it, but it might be at ITAR

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It also matters at the time, as that's a form of power. Guess who can donate seriously to political campaigns, for example.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

True. Question is a bit how much wealth is in things and how much in money - some boomer owning a nice house and a vacation home is very wealthy, but might not necessarily have the liquidity to donate if they live on some relatively small pension.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then why Silent has so little?

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's extremely simple. How many people are alive born before 1946? Not many compared to the other generations. Their wealth went to their boomer children.